Matched rules #4484
Draft
Matched rules #4484
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
area/ebpf
area/testing
area/UX
area/events
area/build
area/flags
area/grpc
labels
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| PoliciesConfig: *cfg, | ||
| TraceePid: uint32(os.Getpid()), | ||
| Options: t.getOptionsConfig(), | ||
| CgroupV1Hid: uint32(t.cgroups.GetDefaultCgroupHierarchyID()), |
Check failure
Code scanning / CodeQL
Incorrect conversion between integer types High
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've mentioned about this in #4482 (comment).
yanivagman
force-pushed
the
matched_rules
branch
7 times, most recently
from
386226b to
3ad4cf4
Compare
THIS PATCH IS NOT COMPLETE. NEED TO ADD USERSPACE PART. Look for proc_tree and process_tree in userspace and remove them as well
yanivagman
force-pushed
the
matched_rules
branch
from
3ad4cf4 to
2ebef5c
Compare
yanivagman
force-pushed
the
matched_rules
branch
2 times, most recently
from
f5f0967 to
1f411ed
Compare
yanivagman
force-pushed
the
matched_rules
branch
from
1f411ed to
6a0c8a7
Compare
geyslan
reviewed
Jan 22, 2025
Comment on lines
+15
to
+20
| func (e *policyError) Is(target error) bool { | ||
| t, ok := target.(*policyError) | ||
| if !ok { | ||
| return false | ||
| } | ||
| return e.msg == t.msg |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Perhaps it should be better to rely on the errors.Is() since it takes care of unwrapping.
| PoliciesConfig: *cfg, | ||
| TraceePid: uint32(os.Getpid()), | ||
| Options: t.getOptionsConfig(), | ||
| CgroupV1Hid: uint32(t.cgroups.GetDefaultCgroupHierarchyID()), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I've mentioned about this in #4482 (comment).
geyslan
reviewed
Feb 26, 2025
| // Retrieve the string filter for the current event | ||
| // TODO: Dynamically determine the filter and type based on policy configuration | ||
| string_filter_config_t *str_filter = &p->event->config.data_filter.string; | ||
|
|
||
| if (!(str_filter->exact_enabled || str_filter->prefix_enabled || str_filter->suffix_enabled)) | ||
| return policies_cfg->enabled_policies; | ||
| return ~0ULL; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Opportunistic fix? @rscampos FYI.
| // Combine rules that use string filters with those that do not | ||
| res |= mask_no_str_filter_rules; | ||
|
|
||
| return res; |
| @@ -3193,7 +3173,7 @@ statfunc int capture_file_write(struct pt_regs *ctx, u32 event_id, bool is_buf) | |||
| del_args(event_id); | |||
|
|
|||
| program_data_t p = {}; | |||
| if (!init_program_data(&p, ctx, NO_EVENT_SUBMIT)) | |||
| if (!init_program_data(&p, ctx, POLICY_SCOPES)) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What does the internal POLICY_SCOPES event must communicate?
| @@ -386,8 +372,12 @@ typedef struct data_filter_config { | |||
| } data_filter_config_t; | |||
|
|
|||
| typedef struct event_config { | |||
| u64 submit_for_policies; | |||
| u16 rules_version; | |||
| u8 has_overflow; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could you elaborate more about has_overflow?
geyslan
reviewed
Apr 30, 2025
| continue | ||
| // range through each userland filterable rule | ||
| for _, rule := range t.policyManager.GetUserlandRules(eventID) { | ||
| if rule.ID > 63 { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It would be good to use a MaxRules alike const.
19 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
1. Explain what the PR does
WIP
2. Explain how to test it
3. Other comments