Remove all patches from pyavtiz, rollback to d502356.

[YaoFei509]

Description

Remove all patches from pyavtiz, rollback to d502356. PPS and owserver works well

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

GitHub issue reference:
Jira reference number [AR-9999]

Documentation summary for feature / change

Please delete this section if entry to main documentation is not needed.

If documentation entry is predicted, please provide key elements for further implementation into main documentation and set label to "Needs Documentation". You are welcome to open a PR to documentation or you can leave following information for technical writer:

• short description (copy / paste of PR title)
• summary (description relevant for end users)
• example of usage (how to see this in function)

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Please also note any relevant details for your test configuration.

• Test A
• Test B

Checklist:

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• My changes generate no new warnings
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Review was skipped as selected files did not have any reviewable changes.

💤 Files selected but had no reviewable changes (1)

• config/kernel/linux-sunxi64-edge.config

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[igorpecovnik]

I understand motive made by Patrick and I understand that nobody wants that things breaks down. Proper - happiness for all - solution would be having two configs, full and minimal. This would stop this conflict which we have to avoid. But this brings some work.

But at least we can try to employ AI for this. I was doing some experiments armbian/armbian.github.io#52 just need to figure out how to make this action workable for everyone, perhaps even from CLI. Another option is to add DEFCONFIG propery to the kernel family and a switch MINIMAL_KERNEL_CONFIG that will use upstream defconfig for particular family. However this is not the best solution as many important things will still be missing out. I am on for AI assisted config adjustment having our full config as input and telling AI "strip out dvb tuners, strip out ...". This will then generate minimal config and auto-propose changes with a PR?

But the problem going back from a cleaned config at the present state - i made clean (and as minimal as possible) cloud config for uefi targets, but something was missing and current way ended up in a mess / breaks all the work that was done / #8377 and resulting config is dirty yet again (but problem was fixed).

Then there is another problem related to kernel configs. Since moving from full to defconfigs, kernel security analysis stopped working. Not that this is something critical, but it was a nice add-on. https://github.com/armbian/build/actions/workflows/pr-kernel-security-analysis.yml

My 2c.

[YaoFei509]

remove this PR.

[igorpecovnik]

remove this PR.

Let's calm down. This repository = development stage - not production. We (and all kernel community) breaks (and fix) things every day.

This doesn't solve the conflict. I am sure you are not the only one with those problems. At this stage we can further compare configs but if results are not satisfactory, we still can revert.