-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
allow bypassing announce queue #8026
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: RC_2_0
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
arvidn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like this idea. But rather than passing around a bool priorty, I think it would make sense to make this a tracker_request_flag_t and make it part of the tracker_request
|
it should probably also be incorporated with "connection boost", so newly added torrents take priority over existing ones, for the first announce |
|
I don't think I understand what connection boost is or does tbh |
|
I made a slightly tweaked version of this idea, here: #8054 |
|
neato! |
When adding a torrent to a client with a lot of torrents, its announce (as far as I understand) is pushed to the end of a queue that could take a while to be processed.
As a workaround if I need to leech immediately, I'd just restart my client and the newer torrents would be added at the top of the queue, but it's rather inelegant.
I'd like a flag for force re-announce to bypass that queue for the torrent to start faster. This PR compiles, but I'm not familiar with the codebase whatsoever so this might not be the appropriate approach. For instance, I'm not sure about how this may or may not be related to https://www.libtorrent.org/reference-Torrent_Handle.html#queue_position_top()
This is more of a feature request than a PR