feat: add ENABLE_ENA_EXPRESS flag for network interface attachment #3341
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…r supported instances Adds a new flag to optionally enable ENA Express when attaching a network interface, only for supported instances
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Adds a new flag to optionally enable ENA Express when attaching a network interface, only for supported instances
What type of PR is this?
improvement
Which issue does this PR fix?:
#3340
What does this PR do / Why do we need it?:
Adds flag for enabling ENA Express when attaching a Network Interface
Testing done on this change:
Will this PR introduce any new dependencies?:
No
Will this break upgrades or downgrades? Has updating a running cluster been tested?:
No
Does this change require updates to the CNI daemonset config files to work?:
No
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?:
Yes, it introduces a new flag to enable this feature
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.