Skip to content

Conversation

@ThirdEyeSqueegee
Copy link
Member

@ThirdEyeSqueegee ThirdEyeSqueegee commented Nov 7, 2025

Issue #, if available:
N/A

Description of changes:

  • Allow passing a new flag, --addon, to run-tests.sh which causes the provider to be installed as an EKS add-on for testing (driver is bundled with the provider)
  • Allow passing a --version flag to run-tests.sh to select which add-on version to test
  • Make generate-test-files.py more concise and rename to test-manager.py
  • Remove old integ testing files

Testing:
Ran integ tests locally--tests are passing locally, there are known issues with the GH workflow setup causing failures here

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@ThirdEyeSqueegee ThirdEyeSqueegee requested a review from a team as a code owner November 7, 2025 21:34
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 7, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 60.10%. Comparing base (6dbe3b9) to head (4783a47).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #541   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   60.10%   60.10%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines         762      762           
=======================================
  Hits          458      458           
  Misses        287      287           
  Partials       17       17           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@ThirdEyeSqueegee ThirdEyeSqueegee changed the title feat: add EKS add-on testing support test: add EKS add-on testing support Nov 22, 2025
@ThirdEyeSqueegee ThirdEyeSqueegee added the safe-to-test Pull Request has been manually reviewed and deemed to be safe to run integration tests on. label Nov 22, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the safe-to-test Pull Request has been manually reviewed and deemed to be safe to run integration tests on. label Nov 22, 2025
@ThirdEyeSqueegee ThirdEyeSqueegee added the safe-to-test Pull Request has been manually reviewed and deemed to be safe to run integration tests on. label Nov 22, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the safe-to-test Pull Request has been manually reviewed and deemed to be safe to run integration tests on. label Nov 22, 2025
@ThirdEyeSqueegee ThirdEyeSqueegee added the safe-to-test Pull Request has been manually reviewed and deemed to be safe to run integration tests on. label Nov 22, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the safe-to-test Pull Request has been manually reviewed and deemed to be safe to run integration tests on. label Nov 22, 2025
@ThirdEyeSqueegee ThirdEyeSqueegee added the safe-to-test Pull Request has been manually reviewed and deemed to be safe to run integration tests on. label Nov 22, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the safe-to-test Pull Request has been manually reviewed and deemed to be safe to run integration tests on. label Nov 23, 2025
@ThirdEyeSqueegee ThirdEyeSqueegee added the safe-to-test Pull Request has been manually reviewed and deemed to be safe to run integration tests on. label Nov 23, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the safe-to-test Pull Request has been manually reviewed and deemed to be safe to run integration tests on. label Nov 23, 2025
@ThirdEyeSqueegee ThirdEyeSqueegee added safe-to-test Pull Request has been manually reviewed and deemed to be safe to run integration tests on. and removed safe-to-test Pull Request has been manually reviewed and deemed to be safe to run integration tests on. labels Nov 23, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the safe-to-test Pull Request has been manually reviewed and deemed to be safe to run integration tests on. label Nov 23, 2025
@ThirdEyeSqueegee ThirdEyeSqueegee added the safe-to-test Pull Request has been manually reviewed and deemed to be safe to run integration tests on. label Nov 23, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the safe-to-test Pull Request has been manually reviewed and deemed to be safe to run integration tests on. label Nov 23, 2025
@ThirdEyeSqueegee ThirdEyeSqueegee added the safe-to-test Pull Request has been manually reviewed and deemed to be safe to run integration tests on. label Nov 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

safe-to-test Pull Request has been manually reviewed and deemed to be safe to run integration tests on.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant