Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New Construct: aws-appsync-dynamodb #811

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jeffshep
Copy link

@jeffshep jeffshep commented Sep 20, 2022

  • Issue New Pattern: appsync-dynamodb #99

  • Description of changes:
    Initial design review PR, includes README (using aws-apigateway-dynamodb as a template) and architecture diagram

There would also need to be new AppSync defaults in the core module - proposal for this soon

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@aws-solutions-constructs-team
Copy link
Collaborator

AWS CodeBuild CI Report

  • CodeBuild project: githubautobuild-for-cdk-v2
  • Commit ID: fc13752
  • Result: SUCCEEDED
  • Build Logs (available for 30 days)

Powered by github-codebuild-logs, available on the AWS Serverless Application Repository

@biffgaut
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks! I'm not deep on Appsync - so since this is our first AppSync construct and will define the interface for the service I'm going to recruit an internal specialist to help look it over. So we're on it, but you may not see a response for a couple days. (we're all over DynamoDB, so that part of the interface we can review quickly :-).

@jeffshep
Copy link
Author

that's fine 😃 , I'll try to get the AppSync interface proposal for around the same timeframe

@biffgaut
Copy link
Contributor

Is the current README not what you propose to expose the AppSync functionality? (e.g. - would you not expose HTTP commands in the construct interface?)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants