-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: merge new token managers #255
Closed
Foivos
wants to merge
21
commits into
feat/move-more-to-token-handler
from
feat/merge-new-token-managers
Closed
Changes from 20 commits
Commits
Show all changes
21 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a1720a9
fix: add missing imports to factory interface (#240) (#243)
milapsheth 50f9467
ci: backport ci fixes (#244)
milapsheth 471d60d
v1.2.1
6add3e8
chore: restrict custom token manager deployments (#2)
milapsheth 68c7793
chore: bump version to v1.2.2
milapsheth 608c126
v1.2.2
8342aaf
chore: bump version to v1.2.3
milapsheth 78173e3
v1.2.3
023083e
feat: added new token managers that have the mint/burn permissions. (#1)
Foivos cd8f7be
v1.2.4
d7b0dd8
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/releases/1.2.x' into feat/merge-…
Foivos 573569e
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into feat/merge-new-token-…
Foivos ce3cf52
fixed tests
Foivos d804a7c
Merge branch 'main' into feat/merge-new-token-managers
Foivos a8d346c
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/releases/1.2.x' into feat/merge-…
Foivos 30a919e
fixed tests
Foivos d48a8a9
reduce code size further
Foivos ce9f001
Moving some functionality out of the service and into the token handler
Foivos cde0be6
lint and prettier
Foivos 8c5abff
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into feat/merge-new-token-…
Foivos 05226cb
Update contracts/interfaces/ITokenManagerType.sol
Foivos File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you make these new changes in a separate PR? This PR should be a simple cherry pick of the fix. Makes it easier to audit as well.
Was the issue bytecode size? if so, you can point this PR on the other PR that adds the bytecode fix but keep the token handler refactor separate?