Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/blank node query #497

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 27, 2024
Merged

Fix/blank node query #497

merged 8 commits into from
Feb 27, 2024

Conversation

amimart
Copy link
Member

@amimart amimart commented Feb 27, 2024

Following the conversation on #494, blank nodes will be kept as part of the querying interface, this PR addresses an issue pointed out in a comment regarding the management of those blank nodes.

Details

When providing a blank node in a triple pattern, its value (i.e. the provided id for the blank node) was checked against the triples in the state, which is a non-sense as blank nodes identifiers are ephemeral.

In such case the query engine shall only ensure the relations expressed through blank nodes in triple patterns.

Proposed solution

The proposed solution consider a blank nodes triple patterns inputs as variables, a special type of variables linked to a blank node so that the querying engine can enforce values to be effectively blank nodes. Those variables are treated specially to prevent them from being used as SelectItem.

Misc

Another fix as been done here, when using the same variable multiple times in a single triple pattern, it could have the same value..

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a new property core:hasInformations to entities in multiple languages for enhanced dataset information.
    • Replaced the map function with copied in DataverseCredential implementation for improved data processing.
  • Refactor

    • Modified the TriplePatternIterator struct to include blank_filters for advanced filtering in queries.
    • Updated QueryPlan to use PlanVariable enums for better variable handling and resolution.
    • Adjusted PlanBuilder methods for improved variable management and pattern construction in query planning.

@amimart amimart self-assigned this Feb 27, 2024
@amimart amimart requested a review from ccamel February 27, 2024 01:10
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The updates across various files in the okp4-cognitarium project enhance handling and filtering of triples, especially concerning blank nodes. The introduction of new types and modifications in variable handling, alongside adjustments in iterators and query planning, reflect a comprehensive effort to improve the querying capabilities and efficiency of the system, particularly by refining how blank nodes are managed and filtered in queries.

Changes

File Path Summary
.../src/querier/engine.rs Introduced TriplePatternBlankFilters, updated TriplePatternIterator, and added post_filter and map_triple methods.
.../src/querier/plan.rs Modified QueryPlan to use PlanVariable enums and added BlankVariable in PatternValue.
.../src/querier/plan_builder.rs Updated variable handling and pattern construction in PlanBuilder.

Related issues

  • 🤯 Cognitarium: Remove blank node filtering from messages #494: The changes in this PR seem to refine handling of blank nodes, which aligns with the issue's proposal to manage blank nodes more effectively and avoid exposing their internal identifiers. The introduction of TriplePatternBlankFilters and adjustments in variable handling could be steps towards addressing concerns raised in the issue.

🐰✨
In the realm of data, where triples lay,
A rabbit hopped, refining the way.
With a flick and a twist, blank nodes in sight,
Now filtered with care, through day and night.

"To manage, to query," it whispered with glee,
Improvements abound, for you and for me!
🌟📚

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@amimart amimart marked this pull request as ready for review February 27, 2024 01:10
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 2

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9a7d145 and 12d7952.
Files selected for processing (4)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/engine.rs (27 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/plan.rs (3 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/plan_builder.rs (18 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/variable.rs (4 hunks)
Additional comments: 26
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/plan.rs (5)
  • 13-13: The change to store variables as a vector of PlanVariable enums instead of strings is a significant improvement. It allows for more explicit handling of different variable types, enhancing the clarity and maintainability of the code.
  • 16-19: The introduction of the PlanVariable enum with Basic and BlankNode variants is a thoughtful design choice. It clearly distinguishes between regular variables and blank nodes, aligning with the PR's objective to better manage blank nodes in queries.
  • 23-36: The get_var_index method's adaptation to handle PlanVariable variants is well-implemented. However, it's important to ensure that all calls to this method have been updated to reflect the change in handling variables, especially considering the introduction of blank node handling.
Verification successful

The examination of the get_var_index usage within engine.rs indicates that the method call has been updated to reflect the changes in handling variables, including the introduction of blank node handling. The error handling for cases where a variable is not found aligns with the expectations set by the method's adaptation. Therefore, the review comment concerning the need to ensure all calls to get_var_index have been updated accordingly is verified as addressed.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for usages of get_var_index to ensure they've been updated accordingly.
rg --type rust 'get_var_index'

Length of output: 242



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Examine the usage of get_var_index in engine.rs to ensure it's been updated to reflect changes.
rg --type rust 'get_var_index' contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/engine.rs -C 5

Length of output: 530

* 117-118: Adding the `BlankVariable` variant to the `PatternValue` enum is a crucial update for supporting blank nodes as special variables. This change directly supports the PR's goal of improving blank node handling in queries. * 123-123: The modification in the `lookup_bound_variable` method to include `PatternValue::BlankVariable` ensures that blank nodes are correctly accounted for when determining bound variables. This is a necessary update for the new handling of blank nodes.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/variable.rs (2)
  • 134-140: The introduction of the merge_index method in the ResolvedVariables struct is a significant improvement for managing variable assignments, especially in scenarios where the same variable might be assigned multiple times. This method enhances the robustness of variable handling by preventing unintended overwrites. However, it's crucial to ensure that all instances where variables are merged or set throughout the codebase have been updated to use this new method.
  • 300-320: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [303-350]

The tests provided for the merge_index method effectively demonstrate its intended functionality, particularly in handling scenarios where variables might conflict. It's good practice to include such tests to validate new logic, ensuring that the method behaves as expected under various conditions.

contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/plan_builder.rs (7)
  • 145-148: The implementation for handling Node::BlankNode in build_subject_pattern correctly introduces the concept of BlankVariable for blank nodes. This aligns with the PR's objective to treat blank nodes as special variables, ensuring they are not assigned a fixed identity during query processing. However, ensure that the resolve_blank_variable method is robust and correctly handles the uniqueness of blank variables across different queries.
  • 172-177: Similar to the handling of blank nodes in subjects, the handling of blank nodes in objects within build_object_pattern is consistent and aligns with the PR's objectives. By treating blank nodes as BlankVariable, it ensures the querying engine can process these nodes correctly without assigning them a fixed identity. This is a crucial step in addressing the core problem identified in the PR description.
  • 299-299: The test proper_initialization correctly asserts the initial state of a PlanBuilder instance, including the empty variables vector. This is important for ensuring that the builder starts with no predefined variables, which is crucial for the accurate processing of queries. The test cases provided cover various scenarios, which is good for ensuring the robustness of the initialization logic.
  • 331-343: The test case handling a triple pattern with both subject and object as blank nodes demonstrates the correct application of BlankVariable in a practical scenario. This test case is essential for validating the changes made to support blank nodes as special variables. It's good to see comprehensive test coverage for these scenarios.
  • 430-430: The use of QueryNode::Noop with bound variables in test cases where the subject, predicate, or object does not exist is a good way to handle patterns that cannot be resolved due to missing namespaces or other issues. This approach ensures that the query processing can gracefully handle errors without causing the entire query to fail.
  • 514-517: In the build_plan test case, the handling of variables in the context of an error scenario (e.g., "Empty basic graph pattern") demonstrates the system's ability to correctly manage variable states even when the query cannot be executed. This is crucial for ensuring that error handling does not negatively impact the overall query processing logic.
  • 653-663: The handling of a complex query scenario involving a ForLoopJoin with a BlankVariable in the test cases is a good demonstration of the system's capability to process more complex queries involving blank nodes. This test case is important for validating the changes made to support blank nodes as special variables in a realistic query scenario.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/engine.rs (12)
  • 222-222: The introduction of TriplePatternBlankFilters is a good approach to handling blank node filters in triple patterns. This change aligns with the PR's objective to improve blank node handling in queries.
  • 233-239: The conditional return within the new method of TriplePatternIterator is clear and ensures that the iterator is correctly initialized based on the computed input, output bindings, and filters. This is a good practice for initializing complex structures.
  • 255-259: The post_filter closure effectively filters triples based on blank node criteria. This approach is efficient and concise, leveraging Rust's functional programming capabilities.
  • 351-367: The compute_iter_io method's implementation is well-structured and clearly handles the computation of filters, blank filters, and bindings for the triple pattern. The use of pattern matching here is idiomatic and makes the code easy to follow.
  • 374-386: The resolve_pattern_part method's update to handle blank variables is crucial for the feature being implemented. The method's logic is sound, but it's important to ensure comprehensive testing around this functionality to catch any edge cases.
  • 391-405: The map_triple method is a valuable addition for mapping triples to resolved variables. It's well-implemented and follows Rust's idiomatic practices. However, ensure error handling is robust, especially with the merge_index method calls.
Verification successful

The provided script output shows various instances of StdResult usage in engine.rs, indicating that error handling is indeed part of the codebase. However, it does not directly confirm how errors from merge_index are handled within the map_triple method. To conclusively verify the error handling for merge_index within map_triple, a more targeted examination of the map_triple function's implementation is necessary.


The examination of the map_triple function's implementation confirms that error handling for merge_index calls is properly implemented using the ? operator for error propagation, in line with Rust's idiomatic practices. This addresses the concern raised in the original review comment regarding ensuring robust error handling for merge_index method calls.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for error handling in the merge_index method calls within map_triple.
rg "merge_index" --type rust --files-with-matches | xargs rg "Result"

Length of output: 5090



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Inspect the implementation of map_triple to verify error handling for merge_index calls
rg "fn map_triple" contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/engine.rs -A 20

Length of output: 796

* 412-422: The modifications to the `next` method in `TriplePatternIterator` to handle errors and continue iteration are appropriate. This ensures that iteration over triples is resilient to errors, which is crucial for robust query processing. * 913-913: The introduction of `PlanVariable` enum in test cases is a good practice for testing variable types. This ensures that the tests cover the new functionality related to handling both basic and blank node types. * 981-985: The test case setup with `PlanVariable::Basic` for variables is clear and aligns with the changes made in the PR. It's important to ensure that these test cases adequately cover the new logic introduced for handling blank nodes. * 1446-1448: The setup of variables in the `triple_pattern_iter_compute_io` test function is well-done, ensuring that the tests will accurately reflect the handling of different pattern values. This is crucial for validating the changes made to the `compute_iter_io` method. * 1465-1469: The test case expectations are clearly defined, which is good for ensuring that the `compute_iter_io` method's logic is correctly implemented. It's important to review these test cases to ensure they cover all possible scenarios, including edge cases. * 1645-1646: The test for the `make_state_iter` method's functionality is crucial for ensuring that the filtering logic based on blank node criteria is correctly implemented. It's good to see comprehensive test coverage for different filter scenarios.

contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/plan_builder.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/plan_builder.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@bot-anik
Copy link
Member

bot-anik commented Feb 27, 2024

size-limit report 📦

Path Size
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/okp4_objectarium.wasm 440.47 KB (0%)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/okp4_law_stone.wasm 650.73 KB (0%)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/okp4_cognitarium.wasm 818.57 KB (+0.36% 🔺)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/okp4_dataverse.wasm 660.69 KB (0%)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 99.27273% with 6 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.29%. Comparing base (6722198) to head (554ebc3).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/engine.rs 96.34% 6 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #497      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.20%   96.29%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          55       55              
  Lines       12261    12693     +432     
==========================================
+ Hits        11796    12223     +427     
- Misses        465      470       +5     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 12d7952 and 57b12ed.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/engine.rs (27 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/plan.rs (4 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/plan_builder.rs (18 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/plan.rs
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/plan_builder.rs
Additional comments: 12
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/engine.rs (12)
  • 222-222: The introduction of TriplePatternBlankFilters as a tuple (bool, bool) is a concise way to represent the presence of blank filters for subjects and objects. However, consider documenting what each bool represents for clarity.
  • 233-239: The conditional construction of TriplePatternIterator based on the result of compute_iter_io is a good practice, ensuring that the iterator is only created if necessary filters and bindings are successfully computed.
  • 255-259: The post_filter closure effectively filters triples based on the presence of blank nodes as specified by blank_filters. This approach maintains the logic's simplicity while addressing the core issue of blank node handling.
  • 351-371: The compute_iter_io method's implementation is crucial for determining the filters, blank filters, and output bindings for the iterator. The use of Option for the return type and the tuple structure for the filters and bindings is appropriate. However, ensure that the logic correctly handles all possible combinations of pattern values to avoid any unintended behavior.
Verification successful

Given the need to verify the handling of all pattern value combinations in the compute_iter_io method, and the limitations of the initial script, I will generate a new script to search for the resolve_pattern_part method's definition and usage. This will help in understanding how it's implemented and its role in the compute_iter_io method's logic.


Based on the provided definition and usage of the resolve_pattern_part method, and its integration within the compute_iter_io method, it appears that the implementation is designed to handle all possible combinations of pattern values appropriately. The method processes different types of pattern values and returns a tuple containing filters, blank filters, and bindings, which aligns with the method's purpose. The check for pb_filter within compute_iter_io further suggests that the method includes logic to handle specific query configurations. Therefore, the original concern about ensuring that the logic correctly handles all possible combinations of pattern values seems to have been addressed in the implementation.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Manual verification needed to ensure all pattern value combinations are correctly handled.
echo "Manual check required for compute_iter_io method logic."

Length of output: 120



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for the definition and usage of resolve_pattern_part method
rg "fn resolve_pattern_part" -A 20
rg "resolve_pattern_part" -C 5

Length of output: 3951

* 383-390: The handling of different `PatternValue` variants in `resolve_pattern_part` is well-implemented. It correctly distinguishes between constants, blank variables, and regular variables, setting the groundwork for accurate triple pattern resolution. * 395-409: The `map_triple` method efficiently maps a triple to resolved variables based on the output bindings. This method is essential for transforming query results into a format usable by the rest of the query engine. Ensure that error handling is robust, especially for the `merge_index` calls.
Verification successful

Given the need to verify the robustness of error handling in the map_triple method, specifically regarding the merge_index calls, we will proceed to inspect the implementation details of merge_index and how map_triple manages potential errors from these calls.


The map_triple method employs Rust's idiomatic error handling mechanisms effectively by using the ? operator with the merge_index calls. This approach ensures that any potential inconsistencies or errors detected by merge_index are appropriately propagated, halting the mapping process. The method's design aligns with robust error handling practices within Rust's option and error handling patterns, confirming the adequacy of the error handling in map_triple.

Scripts Executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Manual verification needed to ensure robust error handling in map_triple method.
echo "Manual check required for error handling in map_triple method."

Length of output: 134



Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Inspect the implementation of merge_index and its error handling within map_triple
rg "fn merge_index" -A 10

Length of output: 980


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for error handling mechanisms in map_triple related to merge_index calls
rg "map_triple" -A 20 -B 5

Length of output: 3856

* 416-426: The implementation of the `next` method in `TriplePatternIterator` correctly iterates over triples, applying the `map_triple` method. The recursive call to `self.next()` upon encountering `None` ensures that the iterator continues until a valid result is found or the underlying iterator is exhausted. * 917-917: The introduction of `PlanVariable` enum in test cases is a good practice, as it allows for more expressive and flexible test setups, accommodating both basic and blank node types. * 985-989: The test case setup with `PlanVariable::Basic` variants is clear and straightforward. However, ensure that test coverage is comprehensive, including scenarios with `PlanVariable::Blank` to fully validate the handling of blank nodes. * 1333-1339: The use of `merge_index` within the `ForLoopJoinIterator` test cases demonstrates the method's utility in merging variables based on index. This is a critical part of ensuring that joined results are correctly assembled. Consider adding assertions to verify the correctness of the merged results. * 1407-1413: The setup for `CartesianProductJoinIterator` test cases effectively demonstrates the use of `merge_index` for assembling Cartesian product results. Similar to the `ForLoopJoinIterator` cases, ensure that the correctness of the merged results is thoroughly verified. * 1450-1452: The setup for testing `TriplePatternIterator::compute_iter_io` with pre-merged variables is well done, providing a solid basis for evaluating the method's logic. Ensure that the test cases cover all relevant scenarios, including those with and without blank variables.

@ccamel
Copy link
Member

ccamel commented Feb 27, 2024

Just added a bunch of tests for covering blank nodes query test cases at the contract level.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 57b12ed and 554ebc3.
Files selected for processing (3)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/contract.rs (22 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/testdata/blank-nodes.ttl (1 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-dataverse/src/registrar/credential.rs (1 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/contract.rs: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Additional comments: 14
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/testdata/blank-nodes.ttl (1)
  • 31-33: The property core:hasInformations uses an unusual plural form. RDF properties typically represent relationships or attributes in singular form. Please verify this aligns with the intended ontology design.
contracts/okp4-dataverse/src/registrar/credential.rs (1)
  • 32-32: Replacing .map with .copied() in the extract_vc_type method changes the handling from a reference to a copied value. This is appropriate for types that implement the Copy trait, like &str. Ensure all uses of this method are updated accordingly to handle the copied value.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/contract.rs (12)
  • 529-563: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [381-545]

The tests added for proper_insert, insert_existing_triples, insert_unauthorized, and insert_limits are comprehensive and cover various scenarios including successful insertions, handling of existing triples, unauthorized access, and limit checks. This ensures robustness in data insertion functionality.

  • 606-606: The test insert_existing_triples correctly asserts that re-inserting the same data does not increase the triple count, which is crucial for avoiding duplicate data. This behavior is essential for maintaining data integrity.
  • 966-966: The proper_delete test case demonstrates the contract's ability to handle data deletion accurately, including cases with specific conditions and prefixes. It's good to see that the test verifies the expected decrease in triple count and namespace count, ensuring the delete functionality works as intended.
  • 1139-1139: The proper_store test validates the store query functionality, ensuring that the contract state is correctly reported. This is crucial for clients to understand the current state of the contract, including ownership and limits.
  • 1356-1574: The addition of tests for querying with blank nodes (proper_select_blank_nodes) is particularly relevant to the PR's objectives. These tests ensure that the enhanced handling of blank nodes in queries is functioning as expected. It's good to see various scenarios being tested, including different prefixes and variable usage.
  • 1575-1575: The invalid_select test cases are crucial for ensuring the system's resilience against invalid queries. Testing for exceeded variable counts, limits, missing prefixes, and unselected variables helps guarantee that the system behaves predictably and securely in the face of erroneous input.
  • 1728-1756: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1681-1794]

The formats_describe tests cover the Describe functionality across different data formats (Turtle, RDF/XML, NTriples, NQuads), ensuring the contract can correctly serialize RDF data in various formats. This is essential for interoperability and flexibility in how data can be consumed.

  • 1834-1857: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1837-1864]

The prefixes_describe test validates the handling of prefixed names in describe queries, ensuring that the contract correctly resolves prefixes to full URIs. This is important for user convenience and readability in queries.

  • 1907-1929: The variable_describe test demonstrates the contract's ability to handle variable resources in describe queries, ensuring dynamic query capabilities are robust. This allows for more flexible and powerful queries.
  • 1972-1994: The variable_mutiple_resources_describe test checks the describe functionality with variables that match multiple resources, ensuring the contract can handle complex query patterns and return comprehensive results.
  • 2037-2063: The blanknode_describe test ensures that describe queries can correctly handle blank nodes, which is central to the PR's objectives. This test is crucial for validating the enhanced blank node handling in the querying interface.
  • 2107-2158: The proper_construct tests validate the construct query functionality, ensuring that the contract can correctly build RDF graphs based on query patterns. This includes handling of prefixes and variable substitution, which are key for dynamic graph construction.

Copy link
Member

@ccamel ccamel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's great! Good job. 👍

@amimart amimart merged commit 458b536 into main Feb 27, 2024
18 checks passed
@amimart amimart deleted the fix/blank-node-query branch February 27, 2024 13:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants