Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix/blank node identifier #499

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Feb 29, 2024
Merged

Fix/blank node identifier #499

merged 22 commits into from
Feb 29, 2024

Conversation

amimart
Copy link
Member

@amimart amimart commented Feb 28, 2024

Closes #434
Closes #494

Primarily intended to implement changes discussed in the issues mentioned just above: use internal identifiers for blank to avoid conflicts across insertions, and expose blank nodes in queries as ephemeral and generated identifiers. The impacts being structural the changes present in this PR ended up to be huge, I'll try to explain them.

Blank nodes identifiers

Internally the blank nodes are persisted as u128, unicity being ensured by incrementing a counter, the IdentifierIssuer present in the okp4-rdf package has slightly been modified to ease this purpose.

When querying triples, to map back the blank nodes to an ephemeral identifier the IdentifierIssuer is also used, generating identifiers prefixed by b (e.g. _:b0, _:b1, etc...).

To avoid conflict with provided blank nodes in a Construct, those are renamed using the same strategy but with a different prefix: a (e.g. _:a0, _:a1, etc...).

API changes

TriplePattern

The predicate part of TriplePattern in where clauses can not longer take a blank node as value, being impossible by spec, and in the state.

DeleteData

The delete field containing triple patterns to be deleted has now its own type (i.e. TripleDeleteTemplate instead of TriplePattern), as in this selection we must not be able to select blank nodes.

Construct

For consistency purposes, and because "template" means construction conversely of "pattern" which denotes a filter, the construct field has now its own type (i.e. TripleConstructTemplate), this brings no breaking change as it is identical than TriplePattern in its content.

Behaviour changes

Regarding the DeleteData execution message, to allow the deletion of provided triples the where clause is not mandatory as soon as the delete selection contains not variables.

Performances

The operations of DeleteData, Construct and Describe doesn't rely anymore on the QueryEngine::select, instead of applying the templates on resolved solutions, we directly apply them on the resolved variables. This allow a needed fine control on the resolution, and brings better performances by removing a mapping layer.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced new structures for more efficient triple pattern deletion and construction.
    • Added functionality for generating unique identifiers for blank nodes.
    • Enhanced query planning and execution with new methods and updated structures.
  • Refactor
    • Simplified querier module by removing redundant functions and dependencies.
    • Updated various enums and structs across the system for better clarity and functionality.
    • Improved handling of blank nodes and identifiers in storage and RDF normalization.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Corrected JSON examples and parameter descriptions in documentation to align with system changes.
  • Documentation
    • Updated documentation to reflect new and updated entities, providing clearer examples and descriptions.

@amimart amimart requested a review from ccamel February 28, 2024 00:24
@amimart amimart self-assigned this Feb 28, 2024
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 28, 2024

Walkthrough

The updates across various modules in the OKP4 Cognitarium contracts focus on enhancing blank node handling, refining triple pattern structures, and improving query and storage mechanisms. These changes aim to ensure unique blank node identification per insertion and remove the ability to directly reference blank nodes through message interfaces, aligning with the objectives to prevent blank node conflicts and remove blank node filtering from messages.

Changes

File Pattern Change Summary
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/.../msg.rs Updated ExecuteMsg structure, renamed and adjusted triple pattern templates.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/.../engine.rs Added functions for triple construction, updated imports, and refactored iterators.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/.../mapper.rs Removed functions node_as_subject, node_as_predicate, and node_as_object.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/.../mod.rs Added export of ResolvedVariables.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/.../plan*.rs Updated query plan building with new pattern matching and methods.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/.../variable.rs Modified handling of blank nodes and updated test cases.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/.../blank_nodes.rs Introduced a counter for unique blank node identifiers.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/.../triples.rs Updated blank node handling in triples storage.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/.../engine.rs Integrated IdentifierIssuer for blank node ID issuance in storage engine.
contracts/okp4-dataverse/src/... Updated usage of VarOrNamedNode in tests and registry.
docs/okp4-cognitarium.md Updated documentation to reflect changes in triple pattern and blank node handling.
packages/okp4-rdf/src/normalize.rs Updated IdentifierIssuer structure and methods for identifier issuance.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Prevent blank nodes conflicts (#434)
Remove blank node filtering from messages (#494)

Poem

🐇 In the realm of data so vast and wide,
Where triples dance and blank nodes hide.
With changes wrought, conflicts cease,
In Cognitarium's code, a newfound peace.
🌟 Unique IDs bloom, in storage they glide,
Through queries and nodes, with no place to hide.
A rabbit's work, through the night it sweeps,
Ensuring the data, in harmony, leaps.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@bot-anik
Copy link
Member

bot-anik commented Feb 28, 2024

size-limit report 📦

Path Size
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/okp4_objectarium.wasm 440.47 KB (0%)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/okp4_law_stone.wasm 650.73 KB (0%)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/okp4_cognitarium.wasm 834.97 KB (+2.01% 🔺)
target/wasm32-unknown-unknown/release/okp4_dataverse.wasm 664.55 KB (+0.59% 🔺)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 28, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 96.15385% with 31 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 96.22%. Comparing base (458b536) to head (b7a1272).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/engine.rs 93.85% 14 Missing ⚠️
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/contract.rs 97.82% 9 Missing ⚠️
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/plan.rs 66.66% 4 Missing ⚠️
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/msg.rs 0.00% 3 Missing ⚠️
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/rdf/mapper.rs 75.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #499      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   96.29%   96.22%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          55       55              
  Lines       12693    12774      +81     
==========================================
+ Hits        12223    12292      +69     
- Misses        470      482      +12     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@amimart amimart marked this pull request as ready for review February 28, 2024 17:36
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 9

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between f65821d and b7a1272.
Files selected for processing (17)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/contract.rs (41 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/msg.rs (7 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/engine.rs (28 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/mapper.rs (1 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/mod.rs (1 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/plan.rs (3 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/plan_builder.rs (21 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/variable.rs (9 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/rdf/mapper.rs (1 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/state/blank_nodes.rs (1 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/state/mod.rs (1 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/state/triples.rs (5 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/storer/engine.rs (8 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-dataverse/src/contract.rs (2 hunks)
  • contracts/okp4-dataverse/src/registrar/registry.rs (2 hunks)
  • docs/okp4-cognitarium.md (5 hunks)
  • packages/okp4-rdf/src/normalize.rs (9 hunks)
Files not summarized due to errors (1)
  • contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/contract.rs: Error: Message exceeds token limit
Additional comments: 62
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/state/mod.rs (1)
  • 1-1: The addition of the blank_nodes module and its public re-exportation aligns with the project's structure and naming conventions.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/mod.rs (1)
  • 9-9: Exporting ResolvedVariables from the variable module enhances the module's usability by other components within the project.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/state/blank_nodes.rs (1)
  • 3-4: Introducing BLANK_NODE_IDENTIFIER_COUNTER as a u128 counter for blank node identifiers aligns with the PR's objectives to ensure unique identification, leveraging the Item storage mechanism effectively.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/mapper.rs (1)
  • 1-4: The simplification of mapper.rs by removing specific functions and dependencies on Predicate, Subject, and related logic aligns with the PR's objectives to streamline the querying process and overhaul blank node handling.
contracts/okp4-dataverse/src/registrar/registry.rs (1)
  • 7-8: Renaming VarOrNode to VarOrNamedNode clarifies the distinction between blank and named nodes, aligning with the PR's objectives to improve the handling and querying of blank nodes.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/rdf/mapper.rs (1)
  • 23-31: Updating the TryFrom implementation for Property to use msg::IRI instead of msg::Node enhances the clarity and correctness of the conversion logic, aligning with the PR's objectives to refine the handling of IRIs and properties.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/plan.rs (2)
  • 25-34: The updates to get_var_index and the addition of get_bnode_index enhance the querying logic's efficiency and clarity, aligning with the PR's objectives to improve the handling of blank nodes.
  • 156-163: Updating PatternValue variants for subject and object in the QueryNode struct aligns with the PR's objectives to refine the querying process and the handling of blank nodes, contributing to the querying logic's efficiency and clarity.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/state/triples.rs (4)
  • 80-80: Changing the conversion method for Subject::Blank from as_bytes() to to_be_bytes() aligns with the PR's objectives to ensure unique identification and improve performance.
  • 111-111: Updating the hashing method for Object::Blank to include to_be_bytes().as_slice() aligns with the PR's objectives to ensure unique identification and improve performance.
  • 134-135: Changing the type of BlankNode from String to u128 and introducing the BLANK_NODE_SIZE constant aligns with the PR's objectives to ensure unique identification and improve performance.
  • 195-195: Updating test cases to use u128 values for Object::Blank ensures consistency with the changes made to the handling of blank nodes.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/storer/engine.rs (10)
  • 3-4: The addition of BLANK_NODE_IDENTIFIER_COUNTER and BLANK_NODE_SIZE to the imports is aligned with the PR objectives to handle blank nodes uniquely. Ensure these constants are properly defined elsewhere in the codebase and their values make sense in the context of blank node management.
  • 20-20: The introduction of blank_node_id_issuer in StoreEngine is a crucial part of the new blank node handling mechanism. It's important to ensure that the IdentifierIssuer is used consistently throughout the codebase for managing blank node identifiers.
  • 28-34: Initializing blank_node_id_issuer in the new method with a blank prefix and the loaded blank_node_id_counter is a good practice. However, ensure that the counter is persisted correctly across transactions to maintain uniqueness of identifiers.
  • 61-69: The update to rio_to_triple to include an id_issuer parameter and its usage within the function is aligned with the objective of managing blank nodes effectively. Ensure that all calls to this function are updated to pass the IdentifierIssuer instance.
  • 171-171: Saving the blank_node_id_issuer.counter in the save method is essential for persisting the state of the identifier issuer. Verify that this operation is atomic and consistent, especially in concurrent environments, to avoid identifier conflicts.
  • 187-198: The modifications to rio_to_triple, rio_to_subject, and rio_to_object to utilize the IdentifierIssuer for blank nodes are well-implemented. These changes are central to achieving the PR's objectives regarding blank node management. Ensure that the error handling for unsupported RDF star syntax is consistent with the application's overall error handling strategy.
  • 212-214: The handling of blank nodes in rio_to_subject using the IdentifierIssuer to generate unique identifiers is a key improvement. This approach ensures that blank nodes are uniquely identifiable, aligning with the PR's goals.
  • 230-241: Similarly, the handling of blank nodes in rio_to_object is consistent with the changes in rio_to_subject. This consistency is important for maintaining a uniform approach to blank node management across the system.
  • 278-278: The use of BLANK_NODE_SIZE for calculating the size of blank subjects is a good practice. Ensure that BLANK_NODE_SIZE is set to a reasonable default that accurately reflects the storage requirements for blank nodes.
  • 296-296: Similarly, using BLANK_NODE_SIZE for calculating the size of blank objects ensures consistency in how the size of different components is calculated. This consistency is crucial for accurate storage and performance metrics.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/variable.rs (5)
  • 4-4: The addition of use okp4_rdf::normalize::IdentifierIssuer is necessary for the new handling of blank nodes. This import should be used wherever blank node identifiers need to be generated or managed.
  • 20-20: Changing the handling of Object::Blank to dereference the node is a logical step given the new approach to managing blank nodes. Ensure that this change is consistently applied wherever Object::Blank is used.
  • 45-45: Similarly, the handling of Subject::Blank has been updated to dereference the node. This change is consistent with the handling of Object::Blank and aligns with the new approach to blank node management.
  • 59-65: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [52-75]

The modification of the as_value method to accept an IdentifierIssuer parameter is crucial for generating values for blank nodes. This change ensures that blank nodes can be uniquely identified in queries, aligning with the PR's objectives. Ensure that all calls to as_value are updated to pass the IdentifierIssuer instance.

  • 159-161: The adjustments to test cases to use numeric values for Subject::Blank and Object::Blank and to reflect changes in value generation using IdentifierIssuer are appropriate. These changes ensure that the tests accurately represent the new handling of blank nodes. Verify that all relevant test cases have been updated accordingly.

Also applies to: 230-232, 254-256

contracts/okp4-dataverse/src/contract.rs (1)
  • 134-135: The change from VarOrNode to VarOrNamedNode for the predicate in the TriplePattern structure within the test module aligns with the PR objectives to refine the handling of blank nodes. This modification ensures that predicates are explicitly named nodes, which supports the overall goal of improving the management and querying of blank nodes in the graph database context. This change is consistent and appears correctly implemented in the context of the provided code. However, it's important to verify that all references and usages of TriplePattern throughout the test suite and potentially in the production code have been updated to reflect this change, ensuring no broken functionality or unintended behavior.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/msg.rs (5)
  • 54-54: The predicate structure in ExecuteMsg::DeleteData has been updated to use a named node with a prefixed IRI. This change aligns with the PR's objective to modify the handling of blank nodes and predicates. Ensure that all references and usages of this structure are updated accordingly to prevent any runtime errors.
  • 70-72: The introduction of TripleDeleteTemplate for specifying triple templates to delete is a significant change. This aligns with the PR's objective to improve the handling of blank nodes and streamline deletion operations. Ensure that the implementation of TripleDeleteTemplate correctly handles all possible variations of subjects, predicates, and objects, including blank nodes, named nodes, and literals.
  • 487-497: The TripleDeleteTemplate struct has been correctly defined to include subjects, predicates, and objects as VarOrNamedNode and VarOrNamedNodeOrLiteral. This definition is crucial for the new handling of blank nodes and ensures flexibility in specifying triples for deletion. Review the implementation to ensure that it correctly handles the serialization and deserialization of these fields, especially considering the introduction of the VarOrNamedNodeOrLiteral enum.
  • 499-509: The TripleConstructTemplate struct is introduced to specify triples for construct queries. This change is consistent with the PR's objectives and provides a clear structure for constructing triples. Ensure that the implementation of TripleConstructTemplate correctly handles the serialization and deserialization of subjects, predicates, and objects, considering the use of VarOrNode and VarOrNodeOrLiteral. This is crucial for the correct functioning of construct queries.
  • 563-577: The addition of the VarOrNamedNodeOrLiteral enum is a significant improvement, providing flexibility in specifying subjects, predicates, and objects in triples. This change is crucial for the new handling of blank nodes and enhances the expressiveness of the system. Ensure that the implementation correctly handles all cases of this enum, especially in the context of serialization and deserialization.
packages/okp4-rdf/src/normalize.rs (9)
  • 41-44: The initialization of canonical_issuer with a u128 counter is a significant change aligning with the PR's objective to handle larger ranges of identifiers. This change is crucial for ensuring the uniqueness of blank node identifiers across different insertions.
  • 75-75: Reinitializing canonical_issuer with a u128 counter during the reset method ensures consistency in handling blank node identifiers throughout the normalization process. This consistency is vital for maintaining the integrity of blank node identifiers across operations.
  • 130-130: The use of get_or_issue within label_unique_nodes method to ensure that each unique node receives a canonical identifier is aligned with the PR's objectives. This approach effectively prevents conflicts and ensures that blank nodes are exposed with unique, ephemeral identifiers.
  • 152-153: Creating a new IdentifierIssuer with a u128 counter for scoped issuers within compute_n_degree_hashes method is a thoughtful approach. It ensures that temporary identifiers within the scope of n-degree hash computation are handled consistently with the overall changes.
  • 163-163: The use of get_or_issue for nodes within the compute_n_degree_hashes method ensures that all nodes, whether they are part of the n-degree hash computation or not, receive a canonical identifier. This consistency is crucial for the integrity of the normalization process.
  • 218-218: Initializing a new IdentifierIssuer for choosing the best path in compute_n_degree_hash method aligns with the PR's objectives. This approach ensures that the selection of the best path for n-degree hashes is handled with the same consistency and uniqueness as other parts of the normalization process.
  • 236-236: The introduction of get_str_or_issue method within the compute_n_degree_hash method to handle identifier issuance is a significant improvement. It ensures that identifiers are issued in a consistent manner, aligning with the new handling of blank nodes.
  • 248-248: Reusing get_str_or_issue for recursion within the compute_n_degree_hash method demonstrates a consistent approach to identifier issuance. This reuse is crucial for maintaining the integrity and uniqueness of identifiers throughout the normalization process.
  • 333-370: The changes to the IdentifierIssuer struct, including the transition of the counter field from u64 to u128 and the introduction of new methods get_n_or_issue and get_str_or_issue, are well-aligned with the PR's objectives. These changes are crucial for ensuring the uniqueness of blank node identifiers and avoiding conflicts across different insertions. The implementation is clear, and the methods are well-documented, which enhances maintainability.
contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/plan_builder.rs (3)
  • 2-3: The introduction of VarOrNamedNode alongside VarOrNode and VarOrNodeOrLiteral indicates a refinement in type distinctions for handling different kinds of nodes. This change aligns with the PR's objective to improve the handling of blank nodes by making type distinctions clearer. However, ensure that all usages of these types across the codebase are updated to reflect these changes, especially in contexts where the distinction between named nodes and blank nodes is critical.
  • 92-100: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [76-97]

The build_from_bgp function's logic for determining the type of join (ForLoopJoin vs. CartesianProductJoin) based on the intersection of bound variables is a critical part of query optimization. Ensure that the logic correctly identifies cases where a ForLoopJoin is more efficient than a CartesianProductJoin and vice versa. This is crucial for performance, especially in complex queries.

  • 609-625: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [483-668]

The build_plan test cases demonstrate the system's ability to construct query plans from various triple patterns, including those with blank nodes and named nodes. It's important to ensure comprehensive coverage of all new logic introduced in this PR, including the handling of blank nodes in different contexts (e.g., as subjects, predicates, and objects). Additionally, verify that the performance improvements mentioned in the PR objectives are reflected in these test cases, possibly through benchmark tests.

docs/okp4-cognitarium.md (1)
  • 747-780: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [539-769]

The introduction of TripleConstructTemplate and TripleDeleteTemplate entities is a significant change that directly supports the PR's objectives to enhance the handling of RDF triples, especially in the context of construct and delete operations. These entities allow for more precise specification of triples to be constructed or deleted, which is crucial for the improved handling of blank nodes and overall system performance.

It's essential to ensure that the documentation for these entities is clear and comprehensive. The descriptions provided for the properties of these entities (object, predicate, subject) are concise and accurately reflect their roles within the triple patterns. This clarity helps users understand how to use these new entities effectively in their queries.

The documentation for TripleConstructTemplate and TripleDeleteTemplate entities is well-written and aligns with the PR's objectives. It provides clear guidance on how to specify triples for construct and delete operations, which is crucial for leveraging the system's enhanced capabilities.

contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/querier/engine.rs (5)
  • 78-84: The construct_triples function simplifies the creation of triples from a query plan. This change appears straightforward and correctly utilizes the ResolvedTripleIterator. Ensure that the templates provided are correctly formatted and validated before being passed to this function.
  • 997-1005: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1000-1039]

The test setup includes saving a blank node identifier counter to the storage. This is a critical part of ensuring that blank nodes are handled correctly in the tests. Verify that the counter is correctly initialized and used in subsequent operations to maintain unique identifiers for blank nodes. Additionally, ensure that the test data and the store setup are correctly initialized to reflect the changes made in the main code.

  • 1378-1407: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1381-1433]

The ForLoopJoinIterator test cases are designed to verify the correct behavior of the iterator in various scenarios. It's important to ensure that the test cases cover all relevant situations, including empty inputs and combinations of left and right inputs. Additionally, verify that the merging of variables is done correctly and that the expected results match the actual behavior of the iterator.

  • 1442-1476: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1445-1507]

The CartesianProductJoinIterator test cases aim to validate the iterator's behavior in handling Cartesian products of inputs. Ensure that the test cases are comprehensive and cover different combinations of left and right inputs, including empty cases. The merging of variables and the construction of expected results should be carefully checked to ensure accuracy.

  • 1516-1527: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1519-1603]

The triple_pattern_iter_compute_io test function checks the computation of input and output for triple patterns. This is crucial for ensuring that the triple pattern iterator works correctly with various subject, predicate, and object configurations. Pay special attention to the handling of blank variables and ensure that the expected outcomes are correctly defined for each test case.

contracts/okp4-cognitarium/src/contract.rs (11)
  • 27-27: Initialization of BLANK_NODE_IDENTIFIER_COUNTER with 0u128 ensures that blank node identifiers start from a known state. This is crucial for the new handling mechanism of blank nodes to function correctly.
  • 53-60: The expanded import list, including TripleDeleteTemplate and TripleConstructTemplate, reflects the PR's objectives to introduce new types for delete and construct operations. This change is expected to support the differentiation between operations and enhance the system's ability to handle blank nodes effectively.
  • 94-145: The delete function's logic to handle both empty and non-empty delete vectors using Either (from the either crate) is a clever way to unify the handling of direct deletion templates and derived deletions from the where clause. This approach simplifies the code and makes it more maintainable. However, ensure that the downstream handling of Left and Right variants of Either is correctly implemented to avoid runtime errors.
  • 131-141: The handling of deletions without a where clause by directly resolving templates against an empty set of variables is a significant performance optimization. It bypasses unnecessary query execution for straightforward deletion cases. This change aligns with the PR's objectives to improve performance.
  • 176-182: Introduction of IdentifierIssuer in the query module suggests an enhancement in handling blank nodes, specifically in the context of the describe operation. This aligns with the PR's goal to ensure unique identification of blank nodes, preventing conflicts and ensuring consistency across operations.
  • 250-259: The logic in the describe function to dynamically construct triples based on the query's resource type (variable or named node) demonstrates flexibility in handling different query scenarios. This adaptability is crucial for a graph database context, especially when dealing with complex RDF data structures.
  • 295-313: The use of IdentifierIssuer in the construct function to ensure unique identifiers for blank nodes is a critical improvement. It directly addresses the PR's objective to manage blank nodes more effectively. This change enhances the system's ability to handle RDF data consistently and without conflicts.
  • 336-345: The utility functions, particularly map_select_solutions and construct_atoms, show a deep integration of the new blank node handling mechanism (IdentifierIssuer) into the system. This integration is essential for achieving the PR's objectives related to blank node management and performance improvements.
  • 495-498: The test proper_initialization verifying the initial state of BLANK_NODE_IDENTIFIER_COUNTER is a good practice. It ensures that the system's state aligns with expectations right from the start, which is crucial for the reliable operation of the blank node handling mechanism.
  • 620-652: The test proper_insert_blank_nodes effectively validates the increment of BLANK_NODE_IDENTIFIER_COUNTER upon inserting data containing blank nodes. This test is essential for ensuring the robustness of the blank node identification system introduced in this PR.
  • 2192-2326: The proper_construct test cases demonstrate the system's ability to handle complex RDF data, including blank nodes, using the new constructs introduced in this PR. These tests are crucial for validating the functionality and performance improvements related to blank node handling and query execution.

docs/okp4-cognitarium.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines 615 to 621

#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use crate::msg::Literal::Simple;
use crate::msg::Node::{BlankNode, NamedNode};
use crate::msg::IRI::{Full, Prefixed};
use crate::msg::{
InstantiateMsg, StoreLimitsInput, TriplePattern, VarOrNode, VarOrNodeOrLiteral,
};
use crate::msg::{InstantiateMsg, StoreLimitsInput};
use cosmwasm_std::Uint128;
use schemars::_serde_json;

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [618-658]

The tests for default deserialization of StoreLimitsInput and InstantiateMsg are crucial for ensuring that the system's limitations and instantiation parameters are correctly handled. These tests validate the default values for various store limits, which is important for the system's robustness and reliability. Ensure that additional tests are added to cover the new changes introduced in this PR, especially regarding the handling of blank nodes and the new structs and enums.

Would you like assistance in adding more comprehensive tests to cover the new changes introduced in this PR?

Copy link
Member

@ccamel ccamel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's great! ❤️

@amimart amimart merged commit 29d759c into main Feb 29, 2024
16 of 18 checks passed
@amimart amimart deleted the fix/blank-node-identifier branch February 29, 2024 10:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

🤯 Cognitarium: Remove blank node filtering from messages 🤯 Cognitarium: Prevent blank nodes conflicts
3 participants