Skip to content

Add brotli cgo bindings module #4734

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

eustas
Copy link
Contributor

@eustas eustas commented Jun 2, 2025

@bazel-io skip_check unstable_url

@bazel-io
Copy link
Member

bazel-io commented Jun 2, 2025

Hello @bazelbuild/bcr-maintainers, modules without existing maintainers (brotli_go) have been updated in this PR.
Please review the changes. You can view a diff against the previous version in the "Generate module diff" check.

@eustas
Copy link
Contributor Author

eustas commented Jun 2, 2025

@bazel-io skip_check unstable_url

@bazel-io bazel-io added the skip-url-stability-check Skip the URL stability check for the PR label Jun 2, 2025
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
{
"url": "https://github.com/google/brotli/archive/00c6df4d2f846f3d7d4fc42865af97337e9b545c.tar.gz",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This commit does not correspond to the tag with the version. This is fine for testing it in the BCR CI but shouldn't but merged as is.

I see the following alternatives:

  1. Wait for the next tagged release and use that instead.
  2. Use the tarball from the last tagged version and use patch/overlay to add the go specific parts on BCR.
  3. Use a pseudo-version like 0.0.0-DATE-commit like other modules do. This might be confusing and not work well when mixed with semver versions.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added tag go/cbrotli/v1.1.0.bcr.0. We not yet ready for next release...

@sbarfurth
Copy link
Contributor

What's stalled here?

@eustas
Copy link
Contributor Author

eustas commented Jun 12, 2025

Had a detour to investigate if bazel + cgo + win is possible to fix. Concluded it is not worth it this evening. Will update PR tomorrow, so it will pass CI pipelines.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
skip-url-stability-check Skip the URL stability check for the PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants