-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 56
naga 28 update #132
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
naga 28 update #132
Conversation
|
oh actually, I'm going to back up a bit and just get |
|
wgsl directive support was added in #123 and actually works for the ray queries, as long as the This seems like a pattern solari actually uses at the moment, so I'm not modifying the test to make it pass, but #123 mentions that trying to make this work got complicated. Other than that (and no actual implementation for mesh shaders) this seems like the v28 upgrade completed. |
|
I was able to fix the rayquery test. for composable modules, the If it is not, the error will indicate that the extension is not enabled. called |
…uery extension, so solari can continue to work
|
sorry i see this is only in prune, not necessary then. |
|
doesn't build on windows, seems to be conflicting versions of the windows crate. first error of many:
|
|
|
|
for the if we accept that as the way to do it, we don't need the extra feature. |
This works for the test, but doesn't work in practice when considering solari's real-world usage. |
|
Can you link it pls |
|
bevyengine/bevy#22265 under the "old explanations" for solari's enable-related issue. In composable modules, if we put the wgsl directive before the The flag is only meant as a temporary measure, since Bevy seems to be moving to wesl and this unblocks wgpu 28 by not breaking solari on ray query capable devices. |
| value, | ||
| }, | ||
| _, | ||
| ) => todo!(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why todo?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- The tests for this module do not pass and have not passed since at least 0.14
- It is undocumented according to the README
- It is behind a non-default feature flag
As far as I'm aware, "todo" is the state of the module itself, not just these snippets.
superdump
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If the tests that did pass still pass, and examples and bevy work on top of it then looks ok to me.
@robtfm do you want to finish a review?
|
i made a pr to your branches (here and on the bevy wgpu pr) to make the directives work properly. it has a couple caveats:
but it avoids the feature and works for all the extensions (wgpu_mesh_shader, wgpu_ray_query, wgpu_ray_query_vertex_return, dual_source_blending, f16, clip_distances, plus any they add in future) |
Upgrade to wgpu 28 > [!important] > This can't merge until bevyengine/naga_oil#132 does, and the dependency is updated from my fork to the release. > > Also requires wgpu 28 in dlss_wgpu: bevyengine/dlss_wgpu#17 > [!note] > This does not enable mesh shaders, and neither does the naga_oil PR. I chose to do an upgrade first, then go back and see about mesh shaders. Here's a general list of changes and what I did. Commits are grouped by feature except for the last one, which enabled solari when I ran the solari example. ## MipmapFilterMode is split from FilterMode - Split MipmapFilterMode from FilterMode #8314: gfx-rs/wgpu#8314 solution: implement From for `MipmapFilterMode`/`ImageFilterMode` since the values are the same. The split was because the spec indicates they are different types, even though they have the same values. ## Push Constants are now Immediates - gfx-rs/wgpu#8724 immediate_size is [a u32](https://docs.rs/wgpu/28.0.0/wgpu/struct.PipelineLayoutDescriptor.html#structfield.immediate_size) so use that instead of `PushConstantRange` ## Capabilities name changes - gfx-rs/wgpu#8671 Got new list from https://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu/blob/trunk/wgpu-core/src/device/mod.rs#L449 and copied it in. ## subgroup_{min,max}_size moved from Limits to AdapterInfo - gfx-rs/wgpu#8609 Update the limits to have the fields they have now, mirror the logic from the other limits calls. ## multiview_mask - gfx-rs/wgpu#8206 set to None because we don't use it currently. Its vaguely for VR. ## error scope is now a guard - gfx-rs/wgpu#8685 retain guard and then pop() it later --- I made one mistake during the PR, thinking set_immediates was going to be the size of the immediates and not the offset. I'd like reviewers to take a look at immediates offset and size sites specifically just in case I missed something. Here's a bunch of examples running <img width="1470" height="1040" alt="screenshot-2025-12-24-at-16 47 22@2x" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/83dcf4c8-69f5-480a-b724-86598530f25a" /> <img width="1470" height="1040" alt="screenshot-2025-12-24-at-16 48 44@2x" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/46d897fa-1ab2-44ef-8055-fe2fce740dbc" /> <img width="1470" height="1040" alt="screenshot-2025-12-24-at-16 49 10@2x" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6ae7a9bf-0473-4800-8dfc-233a6a41d6df" /> <img width="1470" height="1040" alt="screenshot-2025-12-24-at-16 49 31@2x" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/89f84a26-cfbd-4196-bca8-111c3d20ba7b" /> ## Known Issues > [!NOTE] > > There are no current known issues. Everything previous has been solved. - [x] enable extensions can not be written in naga oil in a way that allows them to be used in composed modules. Update: this was fixed by introducing a flag in naga-oil to force shaders to allow ray queries in composed modules when using bevy_solari. This is temporary and will be different in WESL-future. <details><summary>old explanation</summary> This is blocking solari from working on nvidia (solari runs successfully on macos m1) because it needs `enable wgpu_ray_query;`. Putting the declaration before `#define_import_path` means it gets stripped out (afaict), and putting it after results in ``` error: expected global declaration, but found a global directive ┌─ embedded://bevy_solari/scene/raytracing_scene_bindings.wgsl:3:1 │ 3 │ enable wgpu_ray_query; │ ^^^^^^ written after first global declaration │ = expected global declaration, but found a global directive ``` </details> - [x] dlss_wgpu mixes apis which [causes panics now](bevyengine/dlss_wgpu#17 (comment)). <details><summary>Previous notes as dlss_wgpu was being fixed here</summary> The wgpu release notes don't mention which PR this was introduced in, only saying: > Using both the wgpu command encoding APIs and CommandEncoder::as_hal_mut on the same encoder will now result in a panic. It was caused by gfx-rs/wgpu#8373 which claimed to not know of any use cases > With record on finish, the actual ordering on the command buffer is deeply counter intuitive (all as_hal would come first) and I think it additionally was just flat out broken in some ways > - https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/743663924229963868/1453786307099758683 Possible path forward is using multiple command buffers: https://discord.com/channels/691052431525675048/743663924229963868/1453795633503670415 </summary> --------- Co-authored-by: robtfm <[email protected]>

This is a working naga 28 update. I noticed some tests haven't passed (specifically cargo test --all-features) since before 0.14, so this PR doesn't attempt to make them pass.
enumerate_adaptors
instance.enumerate_adaptersis async now (and available on webgpu): gfx-rs/wgpu#8230 . more details in the wgpu release notes.ControlBarrier & MemoryBarrier
Barrier was split in two to support MemoryBarriers: gfx-rs/wgpu#7630
From the PR, it seems like falling back to ControlBarrier is fine so that's what I did.
Ray Query enable
ray queries require
enable wgpu_ray_query;: gfx-rs/wgpu#8545This doesn't currently seem to make it through, and the relevant test fails.
ImageAtomic
Image atomics were added in gfx-rs/wgpu#6706
Mesh Shaders
Mesh shaders are a major feature of wgpu 28,
but I've set their fields to None here in the interest of doing an upgrade and not a feature add at the same timehttps://github.com/gfx-rs/wgpu/releases/tag/v28.0.0
update: I found some time and built a wgpu mesh/task shader demo and used that to validate some of the mesh shader functionality. I've used this to successfully compile a task shader with naga-oil and run it, but there's still something missing from the mesh shader module output here.