-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 191
[ENH] Add DWI recommended metadata #2309
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
kabilar
wants to merge
6
commits into
bids-standard:master
Choose a base branch
from
kabilar:dwi-parameters
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+22
−0
Open
Changes from 3 commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5ef201d
Add recommended DWI metadata
kabilar 69fc18f
Update metadata
kabilar e81113f
[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
pre-commit-ci[bot] 7af905f
Update field names and units based on feedback
kabilar eb380c5
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/bids-standard/bids-specif…
kabilar 6851fa9
Fix example
kabilar File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Some comments aren't visible on the classic Files Changed page.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We don't generally use abbreviations. I would say either "DiffusionGradientDuration/Separation" or "GradientDuration/Separation". I would probably prefer the latter if the terms are unambiguous within a diffusion context and wouldn't refer to something else in another context BIDS is likely to touch on.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @effigies. Just avoid any potential future confusion, I would prefer "DiffusionGradientDuration/Separation".
@ayendiki @Tinggong What do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't necessarily like the word "separation", which to me implies the interval between the end of one pulse and the beginning of the other pulse. Other words to potentially use here are "interval", or "offset". I do wonder if given their prevalence in the literature,
BigDeltaandSmallDeltawouldn't be clearer. Also, I do believe that this is a redefinition of something that could already be captured byMixingTime: https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/glossary.html#mixingtime-metadata?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see this as related to #2311
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not familiar with how diffusion sensitization plays out in a "double spin echo" diffusion weighted sequence, but are
MixingTimeandBigDeltareally the same thing?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The timing parameters are defined quite differently for "double" or "twice refocused" spin echo sequences, see https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mrm.10308. IIUC (see Fig 1 therein), there is no "BigDelta" in these sequences, and the intensity of the gradients is somehow integrated across all those small deltas, so I think that's to be handled separately, maybe in the advanced dMRI BEP.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So then, the existing
MixingTimeis not appropriate here, right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not too familiar with
MixingTimebut this paper declares the mixing time, gradient separation, and gradient duration as separate values:...mixing time TM=173.0 ms, gradient separation Δ=185.8 ms and a gradient duration of δ=5.4ms.