443: Fix some mistakes, and add paragraph on fees#1876
Merged
jonatack merged 2 commits intobitcoin:masterfrom Jun 26, 2025
Merged
443: Fix some mistakes, and add paragraph on fees#1876jonatack merged 2 commits intobitcoin:masterfrom
jonatack merged 2 commits intobitcoin:masterfrom
Conversation
Member
|
ACK on the fees explaination in e4e2b7c, I didn't review the other changes. The |
jonatack
reviewed
Jun 25, 2025
| The following values of the other parameters have special meanings: | ||
| * If the <code><taptree></code> is -1, it is replaced with the Merkle root of the current input's tapscript tree. If the taptree is the empty buffer, then the taptweak is skipped. | ||
| * If the <code><pk></code> is 0, it is replaced with the NUMS x-only pubkey <code>0x50929b74c1a04954b78b4b6035e97a5e078a5a0f28ec96d547bfee9ace803ac0</code> defined in [[bip-0340.mediawiki|BIP-340]]. If the <code><pk></code> is -1, it is replaced with the taproot internal key of the current input. | ||
| * If the <code><pk></code> is 0, it is replaced with the NUMS x-only pubkey <code>0x50929b74c1a04954b78b4b6035e97a5e078a5a0f28ec96d547bfee9ace803ac0</code> defined in [[bip-0341.mediawiki|BIP-341]]. If the <code><pk></code> is -1, it is replaced with the taproot internal key of the current input. |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
With this change, are you referring to line 157 in BIP-341?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, that's correct.
jonatack
reviewed
Jun 25, 2025
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes some mistakes in the python pseudocode (that described an older version that is not aligned to the draft implementation in core), and fixes some minor other details.
Commit e4e2b7c also adds a paragraph to clarify that fees are expected to be paid exogenously. While not specific to CCV and rather common to most/all covenant proposals, it was suggested in the comments of the previous PR to have an explainer (cc @Sjors).