Support Pydantic 2.11+ in discriminated union decorator #165
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Internal changes in pydantic mean that the previous use of GenericAlias no longer works. Parameterising the type directly with SubClass[args] still works even if the type checking isn't happy about it.
tpoliaw
force-pushed
the
pydantic_211_support
branch
from
6bf5583 to
7692d1d
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Internal changes in pydantic mean that the previous use of GenericAlias
no longer works. Parameterising the type directly with SubClass[args]
still works even if the type checking isn't happy about it.
Fixes DiamondLightSource/blueapi#908
Instructions to reviewer on how to test:
Checks for reviewer