-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 89
handle wes/wgs inheritance edge case #4440
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 9 commits
babadd7
7115f81
fb1dc19
de664cd
8d9d25d
877abbc
fb88af9
773ba0c
18d1d63
4d58e03
e1edb07
d806332
3206941
ef5a4ec
2d5d07f
f82c0fe
0158391
0b542e1
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,3 +1,3 @@ | ||
This folder comprises a Hail (www.hail.is) native Table or MatrixTable. | ||
Written with version 0.2.130-bea04d9c79b5 | ||
Created at 2024/10/02 14:46:35 | ||
Written with version 0.2.132-678e1f52b999 | ||
Created at 2024/10/28 16:21:30 |
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -205,37 +205,61 @@ def _filter_entries_ht_both_sample_types( | |
) | ||
|
||
ch_ht = None | ||
family_guid_idx_map = defaultdict(dict) | ||
family_idx_map = defaultdict(dict) | ||
for sample_type, sorted_family_sample_data in sample_types: | ||
ht = self._annotate_empty_failed_inheritance(ht, sample_type) | ||
ch_ht = self._annotate_empty_failed_inheritance(ch_ht, sample_type) | ||
|
||
ht, ch_ht = self._filter_inheritance( | ||
ht, ch_ht, inheritance_filter, sorted_family_sample_data, | ||
annotation=sample_type.passes_inheritance_field, entries_ht_field=sample_type.family_entries_field | ||
annotation=sample_type.failed_family_sample_field, entries_ht_field=sample_type.family_entries_field, | ||
family_passes_inheritance_filter=self._get_family_passes_inheritance_filter_both_sample_types | ||
) | ||
for family_idx, samples in enumerate(sorted_family_sample_data): | ||
family_guid = samples[0]['familyGuid'] | ||
family_guid_idx_map[family_guid][sample_type.value] = family_idx | ||
family_idx_map[family_guid][sample_type.value] = family_idx | ||
|
||
family_idx_map = hl.dict(family_guid_idx_map) | ||
family_idx_map = hl.dict(family_idx_map) | ||
ht = self._apply_multi_sample_type_entry_filters(ht, family_idx_map) | ||
ch_ht = self._apply_multi_sample_type_entry_filters(ch_ht, family_idx_map) | ||
return ht, ch_ht | ||
|
||
@staticmethod | ||
def _annotate_empty_failed_inheritance(ht, sample_type): | ||
if ht is None: | ||
return ht | ||
|
||
return ht.annotate(**{ | ||
sample_type.failed_family_sample_field: ht[sample_type.family_entries_field].map( | ||
lambda x: hl.empty_array(hl.tstr) | ||
)}) | ||
|
||
def _get_family_passes_inheritance_filter_both_sample_types( | ||
self, entry_indices, family_idx, genotype, family_samples, ht, annotation | ||
): | ||
return hl.bind( | ||
lambda failed_samples: ht[annotation][family_idx].extend(failed_samples), | ||
entry_indices.get(family_idx).filter( | ||
lambda sample_idx: ~self.GENOTYPE_QUERY_MAP[genotype](family_samples[sample_idx].GT) | ||
).map(lambda sample_idx: family_samples[sample_idx]['sampleId']) | ||
) | ||
|
||
def _apply_multi_sample_type_entry_filters(self, ht, family_idx_map): | ||
if ht is None: | ||
return ht | ||
|
||
# Keep family from both sample types if either passes quality AND inheritance | ||
for sample_type in SampleType: | ||
ht = ht.annotate(**{ | ||
sample_type.family_entries_field: hl.enumerate(ht[sample_type.family_entries_field]).starmap( | ||
lambda i, family_samples: hl.or_missing( | ||
hl.bind( | ||
lambda other_sample_type_idx: ( | ||
self._family_has_valid_sample_type_entries(ht, sample_type, i) | | ||
self._family_has_valid_sample_type_entries(ht, sample_type.other_sample_type, other_sample_type_idx) | ||
), | ||
family_idx_map.get(hl.coalesce(family_samples)[0]['familyGuid']).get(sample_type.other_sample_type.value), | ||
), family_samples) | ||
lambda family_idx, family_samples: hl.or_missing( | ||
hl.bind(lambda other_sample_type_family_idx: (( | ||
self._family_has_valid_quality(ht, sample_type, family_idx) | | ||
self._family_has_valid_quality(ht, sample_type.other_sample_type, other_sample_type_family_idx) | ||
) & | ||
self._family_has_valid_inheritance(ht, sample_type, family_idx, other_sample_type_family_idx) & | ||
self._family_has_valid_inheritance(ht, sample_type.other_sample_type, other_sample_type_family_idx, family_idx) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Commenting for posterity that I'm not 100% sure that this is the final logic we want, because it would allow us to return variants that pass quality and fail inheritance in one sample type and fail quality and pass inheritance in the other, meaning theres no sample type that clearly passes both inheritance and quality. However, I think we maybe do want to return these, the logic gets kind of confusing and I can't quite be sure these would not be helpful. I think being overly permissive here is better, if the analysts are seeing a bunch of cases where they ultimately think that the returned variants are not helpful and should be filtered out we can always go back later and make this a stricter criteria, so we should leave this as is for now There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This makes sense, we may want to consider quality and inheritance passing together and handle it differently (the |
||
), family_idx_map.get(hl.coalesce(family_samples)[0]['familyGuid']).get(sample_type.other_sample_type.value), | ||
), family_samples) | ||
)}) | ||
|
||
# Merge family entries and filters from both sample types | ||
|
@@ -253,13 +277,20 @@ def _apply_multi_sample_type_entry_filters(self, ht, family_idx_map): | |
return ht.filter(ht.family_entries.any(hl.is_defined)) | ||
|
||
@staticmethod | ||
def _family_has_valid_sample_type_entries(ht, sample_type, sample_type_family_idx): | ||
# Note: This logic does not sufficiently handle case 2 here https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1hqDV8ulhviUcR5C4PtNUqkCLXKDsc6pccgFVlFmWUAU/edit?usp=sharing | ||
# and will need to be changed to support it - https://github.com/broadinstitute/seqr/issues/4403 | ||
def _family_has_valid_quality(ht, sample_type, sample_type_family_idx): | ||
return ( | ||
hl.is_defined(sample_type_family_idx) & | ||
hl.is_defined(ht[sample_type.passes_quality_field][sample_type_family_idx]) & | ||
hl.is_defined(ht[sample_type.passes_inheritance_field][sample_type_family_idx]) | ||
hl.is_defined(ht[sample_type.passes_quality_field][sample_type_family_idx]) | ||
) | ||
|
||
@staticmethod | ||
def _family_has_valid_inheritance(ht, sample_type, family_idx, other_sample_type_family_idx): | ||
return hl.bind( | ||
lambda other_sample_type_pass_samples: ( | ||
ht[sample_type.failed_family_sample_field][family_idx].all(other_sample_type_pass_samples.contains) | ||
jklugherz marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
), ht[sample_type.other_sample_type.family_entries_field][other_sample_type_family_idx].filter( | ||
lambda s: ~ht[sample_type.other_sample_type.failed_family_sample_field][other_sample_type_family_idx].contains(s['sampleId']) | ||
|
||
).map(lambda s: s['sampleId']), | ||
) | ||
|
||
def _get_sample_genotype(self, samples, r=None, include_genotype_overrides=False, select_fields=None, **kwargs): | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -388,10 +388,11 @@ async def test_both_sample_types_search(self): | |
[VARIANT2_BOTH_SAMPLE_TYPES], sample_data=FAMILY_2_BOTH_SAMPLE_TYPE_SAMPLE_DATA_MISSING_PARENTAL_WGS, | ||
inheritance_mode=inheritance_mode, **COMP_HET_ALL_PASS_FILTERS, intervals=[variant2_interval] | ||
) | ||
# Genome passes quality and inheritance exome fails inheritance (parental data shows variant is inherited). | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I still think a comment here explaining whats being tested is helpful. Maybe something like "Variant 2 fails inheritance when parental data is present" There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. updated! |
||
# Genome passes quality and inheritance but exome fails inheritance (parental data shows variant is inherited). | ||
# Variant is excluded from search results. | ||
|
||
inheritance_mode = 'de_novo' | ||
|
||
await self._assert_expected_search( | ||
[VARIANT2_BOTH_SAMPLE_TYPES], sample_data=FAMILY_2_BOTH_SAMPLE_TYPE_SAMPLE_DATA_MISSING_PARENTAL_WGS, | ||
[], sample_data=FAMILY_2_BOTH_SAMPLE_TYPE_SAMPLE_DATA_MISSING_PARENTAL_WGS, | ||
inheritance_mode=inheritance_mode, intervals=[variant2_interval] | ||
) | ||
|
||
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.