Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IVS-96/ALB030 - Alignment local placement #307

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2024

Conversation

Ghesselink
Copy link
Contributor

image
image

@Ghesselink Ghesselink changed the base branch from main to development October 21, 2024 11:19
The rule verifies that the ObjectPlacement attribute of every instance of IfcAlignment is of type IfcLocalPlacement.
While the schema allows other placement types (Grid or Linear), this rule ensures that IfcLocalPlacement is used for all alignments.

Scenario: Every instance of IfcAlignment must have an ObjectPlacement of type IfcLocalPlacement
Copy link
Contributor

@civilx64 civilx64 Oct 29, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Per discussion on JIRA ticket.

Edit: ok to leave as-is because IfcLinearPlacement is not a subtype of IfcLocalPlacement and the applicable CT requires a subtype of IfcLocalPlacement.

Copy link
Collaborator

@aothms aothms left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I put in my comments in Jira. Let's continue discussion there.

@civilx64 civilx64 merged commit 3309ad2 into development Nov 4, 2024
2 checks passed
@civilx64 civilx64 deleted the IVS-96-ALB030-Alignment-local-placement branch November 4, 2024 14:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants