Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create local script to replace existing local dev scripts #1295
Create local script to replace existing local dev scripts #1295
Changes from all commits
e39eab1
a31a18b
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
This file was deleted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any reason to support both types? Should we just use the one that is better suited here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The main reason I added both was a bit of a proof of concept. Inside VMware we have some teams that use ko, but are experimenting with using buildpacks, so I was trying to show a way that you could build the same image with either ko or pack.
Which one has the best developer experience is a bit tough to answer since it depends a bit on what you're doing. Iterating locally, ko will be a bit quicker since there is no docker involved, but it is very dependent on your local environment. Building with pack will replicate our ci so as a developer you can have confidence that the changes you are working on locally will behave the same in ci.
I personally think there is room for both, but if I had to chose one I would pick pack because consistency would be more important to me than speed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The trade off is
pack
is what we use to generate our actual releases (and something-something dog fooding), so you would use it to get as close as possible to the release process/candidate. On the other hand,ko
is fast, like 1 min vs 7-10 min. The difference is even greater when both are started from empty caches.This file was deleted.