Skip to content

feat: add section with video links #260

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

vados-cosmonic
Copy link
Collaborator

Resolves #127

@vados-cosmonic vados-cosmonic force-pushed the feat=add-section-with-video-links branch from fc7bec1 to 472153b Compare May 15, 2025 17:42
Copy link
Collaborator

@itowlson itowlson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a great starting point - thanks!

I would maybe suggest some caution around older talks. There has been a lot of churn even since 2023 and I'd be cautious about encouraging people to look to those talks for current information. Of course this will be an ongoing issue for all our outbound links though!

@vados-cosmonic
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Ah great point, I'll do a bit of pruning before I move this forward!

@vados-cosmonic
Copy link
Collaborator Author

OK So it seemed a bit fraught to actually cut out WASM I/O 2023 (the first year!) so what I opted for was a a warning in the conference playlist section -- what do you think @itowlson ?

@itowlson
Copy link
Collaborator

@vados-cosmonic The basic warning is great, but I'd drop the specific example (and definitely wouldn't link to WITX). Focus the reader on the general problem of churn and obsolescence, rather than risking them zeroing in on one change and being less cautious about other (equally obsolete) content.

I do worry that this is going to be a broad issue with full conference playlists, though, and wonder if we should establish a principle like "only full lists from conferences in the last 2 years, otherwise curate." As long as the conference name is mentioned people can search up older ones. But that's something we can ponder over time and we don't need to tackle it for this PR.

@vados-cosmonic vados-cosmonic force-pushed the feat=add-section-with-video-links branch from 2eebdae to be5b346 Compare May 20, 2025 02:15
@vados-cosmonic
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Done! Thanks for the input @itowlson! 🚀

For now we'll make an exception for WASM I/O (since it's kind of... our flagship conference?)

@vados-cosmonic vados-cosmonic merged commit 4a37b60 into bytecodealliance:main May 20, 2025
1 check passed
@vados-cosmonic vados-cosmonic deleted the feat=add-section-with-video-links branch May 20, 2025 02:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Link to component model related talks
2 participants