Feature/54 Google Cloud inclusive properties-local.mk

[anderskristian]

This PR contains

1. gcloud container clusters get-credentials before using kubectl.
2. introducing properties-local.mk
3. The properties-local.mk is "empty" with check that "project" and "region" are defined by the developer.
4. README.md shows sequence of make steps.

[upgradingdave]

Thanks for this @anderskristian!

I'll review this as soon as I have some time (hopefully later this week) 💪

[upgradingdave]

@falko - Can you review this when you have a chance?

This moves custom configurations (such as custom region, machine type, cluster name, dns name, etc) into .mk files inside a config directory.

Please let me know what you think? If you give the 👍 , then I'll refactor azure and aws to match.

[upgradingdave]

Refactored aws tls profile to use config directory.

Still need to refactore other aws profiles as well as azure profiles.

[anderskristian]

I have added .ignore file + improved the Google README.md file with a "sub menu"
I really like the standardisation that @upgradingdave added above.

[CLAassistant]

Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you all sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
1 out of 2 committers have signed the CLA.

✅ upgradingdave
❌ Anders K. Andersen

---

Anders K. Andersen seems not to be a GitHub user. You need a GitHub account to be able to sign the CLA. If you have already a GitHub account, please add the email address used for this commit to your account.
_{You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.}

[falko]

It's great to have the ingress configuration for the Web Modeler but I'd disable it by default.

[falko]

Why is this file required for this PR?

[falko]

Hi @anderskristian,

sorry for not getting back to you earlier. I really like your proposal and recently came to the same conclusion that the configs should better be extracted from the Makefile in this new profile: https://github.com/camunda-community-hub/camunda-8-helm-profiles/tree/main/multi-region/dual-region

Would you still be interested to contribute? If so we would need you to:

1. Sign the Contributor License Agreement
2. Respond to my review questions ;-)
3. Rebase the PR on top of the latest main branch if possible

Cheers,
Falko

[anderskristian]

I will still like to contribute.

1. I have signed the Contributor License Agreement
2. This thing is so long ago, that I have lost the touch of what's going on.
   I will accept your changes.
3. I basically think we should redo the things from the current latest main.
   As I understand Camunda has simplified the deployment of Camunda 8.
   Therefore I cannot pin-point what to do 🧐