You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm on version v6.3.2 and I was reviewing the work done by the script get_rg_cns.R.
I realized that the vector cn_estimates, which is the main output, contained always onlyNA values, indicating that the estimation for small copy number segments was not working.
After further investigation, I realized that bedtools was not returning headers expected by get_rg_cns.R, specifically seg_coords were not included in the output of the bedtools coverage system call--resulting in coverages being a vector of NA values:
Best regards,
I'm on version
v6.3.2
and I was reviewing the work done by the script get_rg_cns.R.I realized that the vector
cn_estimates
, which is the main output, contained always onlyNA
values, indicating that the estimation for small copy number segments was not working.BRASS/perl/share/Rscripts/get_rg_cns.R
Line 426 in dd0e1c1
After further investigation, I realized that bedtools was not returning headers expected by
get_rg_cns.R
, specificallyseg_coords
were not included in the output of the bedtools coverage system call--resulting incoverages
being a vector ofNA
values:BRASS/perl/share/Rscripts/get_rg_cns.R
Lines 401 to 402 in dd0e1c1
I noticed that on release
v6.3.4
you make a reference tostack collision
errors, and I wonder if that means this same bug I'm encountering.Thank you so much in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: