Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update canonicalwebteam.discourse to 5.6.0 #296

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

petesfrench
Copy link
Contributor

@petesfrench petesfrench commented Jun 25, 2024

Done

  • Update canonicalwebteam.discourse to 5.5.0

QA

@webteam-app
Copy link

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.19%. Comparing base (af0a015) to head (35ecf99).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #296      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.60%   76.19%   +0.58%     
==========================================
  Files           3        3              
  Lines          41       42       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits           31       32       +1     
  Misses         10       10              
Flag Coverage Δ
python 76.19% <ø> (+0.58%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@britneywwc
Copy link
Contributor

The demos are still failing, I tried rebuilding here https://jenkins.canonical.com/webteam/job/start-demo/24807/

@petesfrench petesfrench changed the title Update canonicalwebteam.discourse to 5.5.0 Update canonicalwebteam.discourse to 5.6.0 Jul 3, 2024
@petesfrench
Copy link
Contributor Author

Closing - there is a more recent PR here #298

@petesfrench petesfrench closed this Jul 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants