Remove yard reference from gemfile #1033
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Got it - this one was to help local linting of Solargraph code until that PR gets merged. We can definitely add false violations to the RuboCop todo file instead until then instead to keep the Gemfile less confusing, though. |
castwide
force-pushed
the
gemfile-yard-exception
branch
from
df3acc4 to
0305c54
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@apiology If you need to use your fork of the yard gem for development, you can create a
.Gemfile(note the dot) in the project root. Bundler will load it and Git will ignore it.