Skip to content

fix: make deleted member function public #2988

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2025

Conversation

e-kwsm
Copy link
Contributor

@e-kwsm e-kwsm commented Jun 9, 2025

Description

modernize-*,

modernize-use-equals-delete is enabled and the code complies with it, but clang-tidy issues warning: "deleted member function should be public."

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 9, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 90.98%. Comparing base (1de7d0e) to head (6665cc1).
Report is 3 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##            devel    #2988   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.98%   90.98%           
=======================================
  Files         198      198           
  Lines        8599     8599           
=======================================
  Hits         7823     7823           
  Misses        776      776           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@e-kwsm e-kwsm force-pushed the modernize-use-equals-delete branch from fc826f6 to 6665cc1 Compare June 15, 2025 06:49
Copy link
Collaborator

@ChrisThrasher ChrisThrasher left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch. Thanks for all these clang-tidy cleanup.

@ChrisThrasher ChrisThrasher merged commit 416b075 into catchorg:devel Jun 15, 2025
92 checks passed
@e-kwsm e-kwsm deleted the modernize-use-equals-delete branch June 15, 2025 21:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants