Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 5, 2026. It is now read-only.

Create check-pricing#1325

Closed
AlbertoGoYu wants to merge 8 commits intocheckly:mainfrom
AlbertoGoYu:patch-1
Closed

Create check-pricing#1325
AlbertoGoYu wants to merge 8 commits intocheckly:mainfrom
AlbertoGoYu:patch-1

Conversation

@AlbertoGoYu
Copy link

@AlbertoGoYu AlbertoGoYu commented Jul 10, 2025

  • Based on old Check pricing section, new section to explain how the new pricing works
  • Explain differences between Uptime and Synthetics
  • Explained Prepaid bundles
  • Explained Overages
  • Added examples

Affected Components

  • Content & Marketing
  • Pricing
  • Test
  • Docs
  • Learn
  • Other

Pre-Requisites

  • Code is linted (npm run lint)

Notes for the Reviewer

New Dependency Submission

Screenshots

- Based on old Check pricing section, new section to explain how the new pricing works
- Explain differences between Uptime and Synthetics 
- Explained Prepaid bundles
- Explained Overages
- Added examples
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 10, 2025

@AlbertoGoYu is attempting to deploy a commit to the Checkly Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jul 10, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
checklyhq-com ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jul 10, 2025 9:06pm

MegaMaddin
MegaMaddin previously approved these changes Jul 11, 2025
Copy link
Member

@MegaMaddin MegaMaddin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One nit/question inline.

- **Prepaid check bundles**: Discounted packages of check runs purchased in advance
- **Overages**: Additional charges when you exceed your plan's included check runs or monitors, typically at higher rates than prepaid bundles

## Pricing Table
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm a bit afraid that keeping all the existing pricing tables in sync is gonna be hard - we already found quite some issues keeping two tables in sync. Can't we just link to the pricing page from here?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, agreed I'll work in a version that refers to the Pricing page instead

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Check runs for monitors shouldn't affect cost, right?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

indeed, good catch

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overages don't apply for monitors (at least not yet), right? You can only create as many monitors as you purchased

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that true, I'll update that

- **Parallel scheduling**: Running checks simultaneously from multiple locations
- **Retries**: Automatic re-execution of failed checks
- **Flaky checks**: Checks that fail intermittently due to network issues or timing problems
- **Prepaid check bundles**: Discounted packages of check runs purchased in advance
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Tiny nit, how about moving Check runs right above this so that we consistently explains things related to check runs right below it?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

i'll move check runs as the first item

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about something like

Suggested change
A given set of Uptime Checks are included in the Starter, Team, and Enterprise plans. Users can complete the existing plan allowance of Uptime Checks by adding to their plans packages of 25 monitors for $10 each.
A set number of Uptime Checks is included in the Starter, Team, and Enterprise plans. Users can extend their plan’s allowance by adding packages of 25 monitors for $10 each.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm going to change that phrasing to talk more generically about monitor packages, and point to the pricing page to see the available packages

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should we add something like contact support with a link or so?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will add


### Retries

Retries on Uptime monitors are included in the price and limited to 1 retry per monitor per run.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is only the case for starter and hobby according to the gSheet, right?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no it's for all pans, we are going to limit retries to 1 as a whole due to costs

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We don't allow for overages on uptime checks AFAIK, no?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

true

Co-authored-by: Manel Fourati <manel@checklyhq.com>
AlbertoGoYu and others added 5 commits July 17, 2025 10:42
Co-authored-by: Manel Fourati <manel@checklyhq.com>
Co-authored-by: Manel Fourati <manel@checklyhq.com>
Co-authored-by: Manel Fourati <manel@checklyhq.com>
Addressing all comments in the PR
@tnolet tnolet removed their request for review November 4, 2025 09:26
@hwartig hwartig closed this Jan 5, 2026
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

Comments