Skip to content

feat(clerk-js): Use stricter organization slug validation #5635

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jacekradko
Copy link
Member

@jacekradko jacekradko commented Apr 15, 2025

Description

Related: https://github.com/clerk/clerk_go/pull/10933

Checklist

  • pnpm test runs as expected.
  • pnpm build runs as expected.
  • (If applicable) JSDoc comments have been added or updated for any package exports
  • (If applicable) Documentation has been updated

Type of change

  • 🐛 Bug fix
  • 🌟 New feature
  • 🔨 Breaking change
  • 📖 Refactoring / dependency upgrade / documentation
  • other:

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Apr 15, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: ffb9906

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 15, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
clerk-js-sandbox ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Apr 15, 2025 6:32pm

@jacekradko jacekradko changed the title feat(clerk-js): stricter organization slug validation feat(clerk-js): Use stricter organization slug validation Apr 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants