Skip to content

fix: add codecov args #248

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 23, 2025
Merged

fix: add codecov args #248

merged 2 commits into from
May 23, 2025

Conversation

thomasrockhu-codecov
Copy link
Contributor

@thomasrockhu-codecov thomasrockhu-codecov commented May 22, 2025

fixes #246

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 22, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (0d0ab6c) to head (93184a2).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #248   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines            4         4           
=========================================
  Hits             4         4           
Flag Coverage Δ
ENV_VAR_CONTAINING_FLAG 100.00% <ø> (?)
string_flag 100.00% <ø> (?)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@thomasrockhu-codecov thomasrockhu-codecov force-pushed the th/add-codecov-args branch 7 times, most recently from 0937b64 to 48256a0 Compare May 23, 2025 16:56

if len(contents) >= 8191:
print(f'Due to Windows limitations, script {new_file} must be less than 8192 chars')
exit(1)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it not possible to have non-windows runners? Can we remove this condition for those folks if so?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the effort to add in the checking for non-windows and building two versions of the orb don't seem worth it. Although, tbf, this is kinda... muckity muck anyways

Copy link

@spalmurray spalmurray left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm two questions

@thomasrockhu-codecov thomasrockhu-codecov merged commit 251b791 into main May 23, 2025
15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Uploading coverage file fails in v5.4.1
2 participants