Introduced a way to generate tags automatically #16
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Yaraslaut
force-pushed
the
improvement/auto_tags
branch
24 times, most recently
from
062496a to
7d53538
Compare
Yaraslaut
force-pushed
the
improvement/auto_tags
branch
from
7d53538 to
1a207a6
Compare
christianparpart
approved these changes
Feb 10, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Introduced a way to declare boxed types without specifying unique tag, added tests and updated README
Also, some context on how this is possible
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22232164/why-are-lambda-expressions-not-allowed-in-an-unevaluated-operands-but-allowed-in
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/lambda#Lambdas_in_unevaluated_contexts
Compilers support:
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/compiler_support#C.2B.2B20_features
See
Lambdas in unevaluated contextsentry