8214972: Uses of klass_holder() except GC need to apply GC barriers #3059 #393
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…sses_do() leads to build failures
fandreuz
force-pushed
the
JDK-8210321-JDK-8214972
branch
from
21ecb72 to
8bcb6d6
Compare
Fix klass_holder() and make all callers use it, remove holder_phantom().
fandreuz
force-pushed
the
JDK-8210321-JDK-8214972
branch
from
8bcb6d6 to
51e2267
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
I've been working on a backport to fix JDK-8339725. The fix in openjdk/jdk#20907 is not enough to fix the problem on jdk11.
The missing backport is JDK-8214972, which I apply in this PR. JDK-8210321 is also needed for
ClassLoaderData::holder_no_keepalive.Related issues
async-profiler/async-profiler#974
Motivation and context
JDK-8339725 affects users of Async-Profiler, and the backports in this PR are a prerequisite for the fix to be fully effective. I'm going to open a new PR to complete the fix if this one is accepted.
I proposed this PR in openjdk/jdk11u-dev#3059, but it was rejected.
How has this been tested?
tier1 and tier2 tests completed successfully.
Platform information
Tested on Amazon Linux 2.
Additional context
n/a