Skip to content

feat(diagnostics): Add thread dumps endpoint and storage #894

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 20 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Josh-Matsuoka
Copy link
Contributor

Related to: #135

Initial implementation of thread dumps endpoint and storage setup/interaction

Opening as Draft until frontend is done since this will probably end up needing adjustments as that gets implemented.

TODO: Refactor (probably into a ThreadDumpHelper class like RecordingHelper)

@Josh-Matsuoka Josh-Matsuoka added feat New feature or request safe-to-test labels May 2, 2025
@Josh-Matsuoka Josh-Matsuoka self-assigned this May 2, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the needs-triage Needs thorough attention from code reviewers label May 2, 2025
@Josh-Matsuoka Josh-Matsuoka marked this pull request as ready for review June 2, 2025 20:56
@andrewazores andrewazores removed the needs-triage Needs thorough attention from code reviewers label Jun 6, 2025
@andrewazores andrewazores changed the title feat(diagnostics: Add thread dumps endpoint and storage feat(diagnostics): Add thread dumps endpoint and storage Jun 6, 2025

public static final String METADATA_STORAGE_MODE_TAGGING = "tagging";
public static final String METADATA_STORAGE_MODE_OBJECTMETA = "metadata";
public static final String METADATA_STORAGE_MODE_BUCKET = "bucket";
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note for later: this is duplicated between here and #927's ArchivedRecordingMetadataService, so we should do some refactoring after one of these PRs goes in and the other is rebased on top of it.

@andrewazores
Copy link
Member

Rebase please. Could you also look at doing the refactoring mentioned in a previous comment? This is looking good from a read-over, so I'll give it a test run soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feat New feature or request safe-to-test
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants