Conversation
…f container to keep the parameters.
…and to parse_laser_info().
…Container() class and parse_laser_info() function.
…ports. Filtering for the unique reports has been added.
Filtering the unique reports is improved.
Reading the unique reports has been improved
…arameters in the container. All the parameters in the container are stored in the list of parameters now.
�# Please enter the commit message for your changes. Lines starting
`# Please enter the commit message for your changes. Lines starting
Trailing whitespaces and unused libraries have been removed.
ctapipe_io_magic/__init__.py
Outdated
|
|
||
| class ReportLaserContainer(Container): | ||
| """ Container for Magic laser parameters """ | ||
| UniqueID = Field(List[Any], 'No.') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
you should merge the latest changes from the lidar_test branch here
| def magic_reports_reading(self, input_file, process_run=False): | ||
| logger.info(f"\nInput file: {input_file}") | ||
| event_source = MAGICEventSource(input_file, process_run=process_run) | ||
| is_simulation = event_source.is_simulation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
there are no reports in simulations
| is_simulation = event_source.is_simulation | ||
| logger.info(f"\nIs simulation: {is_simulation}") | ||
|
|
||
| obs_id = event_source.obs_ids[0] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
is this needed, looks like debugging
|
|
||
| laser = event_source.laser | ||
|
|
||
| for key, report_list in laser.items(): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this does not fit the current scheme of writing the reports: list rather then a dictionary
and the whole loop is not needed because it just shown a debug message
| return report | ||
|
|
||
| def get_c0(self, time, zenith, range_max): | ||
| filename = '/home/zywuckan/ctapipe_io_magic/ctapipe_io_magic/params.txt' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
you should use relative paths here
| variable, value = line.split("=") | ||
| variable = variable.strip() | ||
| value = value.split("#")[0].strip() | ||
| if variable == "stime21": |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
all this code just to initialize a bunch of variables to -1 ??
and you should use arrays of parameters rather then stimeXX
| gkHWSwitchV1to4 = int(value) | ||
|
|
||
| C_0 = gkC_0Period1 # absolute calibration at beginning of 2013 | ||
| if stime21 > 0: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
all of those stimes are read in as -1 so neither of the conditions later on will trigger
|
|
||
| return report | ||
|
|
||
| def get_c0(self, time, zenith, range_max): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
add a doc string explaining the parameters and units
| range_max_clouds = (range_max - 100.) * np.cos(zenith_radians) | ||
| return C_0 | ||
|
|
||
| def apply_time_dependent_corrections(self, datime, c0, coszd, case_index=None): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
case_index is not used in the function
add doc string with explanation of parameters
|
|
||
| def apply_time_dependent_corrections(self, datime, c0, coszd, case_index=None): | ||
| switch_times = {} | ||
| filename = '/home/zywuckan/ctapipe_io_magic/ctapipe_io_magic/switch_times.txt' |
| with open(filename, 'r') as file: | ||
| switch_time = None | ||
| for line in file: | ||
| if line.startswith("Switch Time:"): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is a bit dangerous because it depends on the sequence of switch time and correction parameters lines.
Why not simply put both in the same line, first the date and then correction parameters
maybe also drop the lines starting with # (like you do in params.txt) and add a comment in the file
| if switch_time: | ||
| switch_times[switch_time] = correction_params | ||
|
|
||
| stimes = [(datime - switch_time).total_seconds() for switch_time in switch_times] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
stimes and AlphaFit_corr are not use and not returned by the function
| stimes = [(datime - switch_time).total_seconds() for switch_time in switch_times] | ||
| Alphafit_corr = 0.0 | ||
|
|
||
| def apply_zenith_correction(self, c0, coszd): |
| return True | ||
|
|
||
| def apply_azimuth_correction(self, c0, zenith, azimuth): | ||
| filename = '/home/zywuckan/ctapipe_io_magic/ctapipe_io_magic/zd_az_corr.txt' |
| c0 += 2 * zd_corr | ||
| return True | ||
|
|
||
| def apply_azimuth_correction(self, c0, zenith, azimuth): |
| with open(filename, 'r') as file: | ||
| rule = {} | ||
| for line in file: | ||
| if line.startswith("Rule"): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
add skipping lines with #
| if rule: | ||
| rules.append(rule) | ||
| rule = {} | ||
| elif line.startswith("Zenith Threshold:"): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it would be simpler if you use only threshold min threshold max, but if it is not filled you initialize it with 0 and 90 deg
| return True | ||
| return False | ||
|
|
||
| def get_bin_width(self, ifadc, bgsamples, ncollapse): |
| return False | ||
|
|
||
| def get_bin_width(self, ifadc, bgsamples, ncollapse): | ||
| filename = '/home/zywuckan/ctapipe_io_magic/ctapipe_io_magic/params.txt' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
relative paths
also this file seems to be opened in multiple functions
| if bgsamples <= gkBGSamplesV1to4: | ||
| return 0.0 | ||
| if ifadc < 128: | ||
| return - bgsamples * gkIntegrationWindow * self.get_bin_width(ifadc, bgsamples-1, ncollapse) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I hope this function will not be executed for every event, because it is doing file operations
| return ((phecounts - self.get_bin_width(ifadc, bgsamples, ncollapse) * bg) * hwcorr | ||
| / self.get_bin_width(ifadc, bgsamples, ncollapse)) | ||
|
|
||
| def main(): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is fine for tests, but ultimately you should just execute the relevant functions from init.py file and store the calibrated LIDAR information in the data structure (like you do with uncalibrated)
…rameters azimuth_conditions.txt: parameters to perform azimuth corrections switch_times.txt and switchtimes1.txt: parameters to perform time corrections
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #95 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 89.57% 63.82% -25.75%
===========================================
Files 10 13 +3
Lines 1103 1935 +832
===========================================
+ Hits 988 1235 +247
- Misses 115 700 +585 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
2 participants
No description provided.