Wayland patch

[silovaa]

I would like to propose replacing the implementation of the GTK window with the Wayland window. I am interested in using Elements on the Linux platform.

[djowel]

Wonderful! What I've been waiting for!

[djowel]

• I moved this to target develop to avoid disrupting master. I'll need to test functionality there.
• It seems the tests are failing on Ubuntu and Windows, can you check?

[djowel]

Also, wouldn't it make sense to have BOTH GTK window AND Wayland window, with specific cmake flags to configure either?

[silovaa]

Fixed the failure of tests under Ubuntu. It won't be possible to fix it quickly on Windows, it will take time, there is something wrong with the linking at the build stage (artist.lib(harfbuzz.cpp.obj) : error LNK2005: roundf already defined in libucrt.lib(round.obj)).
Regarding GTK, I just don't see any practical sense in opening the GTK window to draw Elements buttons there. Maybe it's justified, but then why GTK and not Qt, for example? I think it would be good if Elements simply drew into an abstract buffer or GL Context and received input through the interface.

[djowel]

Fixed the failure of tests under Ubuntu. It won't be possible to fix it quickly on Windows, it will take time, there is something wrong with the linking at the build stage (artist.lib(harfbuzz.cpp.obj) : error LNK2005: roundf already defined in libucrt.lib(round.obj)). Regarding GTK, I just don't see any practical sense in opening the GTK window to draw Elements buttons there. Maybe it's justified, but then why GTK and not Qt, for example? I think it would be good if Elements simply drew into an abstract buffer or GL Context and received input through the interface.

OK, agreed. GTK is not really necessary. That is a good point. But how about X11? Is that abandoned in this patch? (Pardon if it's a silly question. I haven't yet looked deeper)

[silovaa]

Yes, the x11 is not there. X server is considered an outdated technology and it will soon be stopped being included in distributions by default (maybe in 10 years), there is a lot of debate about this. X11 is very different from wayland, its support can be enabled via cmake.

[djowel]

its support can be enabled via cmake.

What does this mean, exactly? I didn't see any config switches. What am I missing?

[silovaa]

I'm sorry if I didn't put it right. X11 is not in the patch, I can add it if necessary. If you look at ubuntu, it has been using wayland by default for a long time, so Xorg support is not needed in new applications.

[djowel]

I'm sorry if I didn't put it right. X11 is not in the patch, I can add it if necessary. If you look at ubuntu, it has been using wayland by default for a long time, so Xorg support is not needed in new applications.

Right. I think X11 is still needed for backward compatibility. Please do. Some people might rely on it.

[silovaa]

Ok. I'll get on it soon.

[djowel]

Ok. I'll get on it soon.

That will be awesome! I really appreciate the work you're doing here! Many thanks!

[djowel]

Should we just move forward and stop using X11?

[silovaa]

No, the big load is the window version. вт, 2 сент. 2025 г. в 03:34, Joel de Guzman ***@***.***>:

…

*djowel* left a comment (cycfi/artist#26) <#26 (comment)> Should we just move forward and stop using X11? — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#26 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BBOYR5KLYOIXS56X3X5WZZD3QTQY5AVCNFSM6AAAAABZ76PQ4OVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTENBTGQ2TQNJZGI> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>