Skip to content

Feature/azure network redesign#137

Merged
connorbrown-db merged 24 commits intomainfrom
feature/azure-network-redesign
May 1, 2025
Merged

Feature/azure network redesign#137
connorbrown-db merged 24 commits intomainfrom
feature/azure-network-redesign

Conversation

@connorbrown-db
Copy link
Contributor

@connorbrown-db connorbrown-db commented Mar 21, 2025

Bug Fixes

Features

BREAKING CHANGES

  • azure: Azure SRA no longer supports creating spokes in a for_each. Each spoke must now be created as a separate module. This ultimately supports creating workspace objects using a provider per workspace.
  • azure: The metastore no longer includes default storage. Spokes must create catalogs in discrete storage accounts.

@connorbrown-db connorbrown-db mentioned this pull request Mar 21, 2025
@connorbrown-db
Copy link
Contributor Author

Doc changes are pending. Will take out of draft status when finished.

@connorbrown-db connorbrown-db force-pushed the feature/azure-network-redesign branch from e2a4b0c to 95fac1c Compare April 15, 2025 13:55
@connorbrown-db connorbrown-db marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2025 14:30
Copy link
Contributor

@tonykhbo tonykhbo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice changes and refactor! Looks good to me.

@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
locals {
create_sat_sp = var.sat_configuration.enabled && var.sat_service_principal.client_id == ""
sat_client_id = local.create_sat_sp ? azuread_service_principal.sat[0].client_id : var.sat_service_principal.client_id
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NIT @connorbrown-db Maybe we should consider renaming the SP so that it's non-exclusive to SAT. Future customizations may leverage the same SP together with the SAT deployment

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For what it's worth, I kind of like it being exclusive to SAT, at least while that's all it's being used for. I think there's an argument for an "administrative" SP at some point, but there's probably counterarguments for separation of concerns as well. Agreed it's not the highest priority to solve.

@nathanknox
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks good to me, @connorbrown-db! Thanks for the contributions, I know this is a lot of work!

BREAKING CHANGE: The metastore no longer includes default storage. Spokes must create catalogs in discrete storage accounts.
BREAKING CHANGE: Azure SRA no longer supports creating spokes in a for_each. Each spoke must now be created as a separate module. This ultimately supports creating workspace objects using a provider per workspace.
@connorbrown-db connorbrown-db force-pushed the feature/azure-network-redesign branch from 9bc7438 to f418673 Compare May 1, 2025 12:10
@connorbrown-db connorbrown-db merged commit 18253c8 into main May 1, 2025
13 checks passed
@connorbrown-db connorbrown-db deleted the feature/azure-network-redesign branch May 1, 2025 13:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants