Skip to content

Feature/azure network redesign #137

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 24 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

connorbrown-db
Copy link
Contributor

@connorbrown-db connorbrown-db commented Mar 21, 2025

Bug Fixes

Features

BREAKING CHANGES

  • azure: Azure SRA no longer supports creating spokes in a for_each. Each spoke must now be created as a separate module. This ultimately supports creating workspace objects using a provider per workspace.
  • azure: The metastore no longer includes default storage. Spokes must create catalogs in discrete storage accounts.

@connorbrown-db connorbrown-db mentioned this pull request Mar 21, 2025
@connorbrown-db
Copy link
Contributor Author

Doc changes are pending. Will take out of draft status when finished.

@connorbrown-db connorbrown-db force-pushed the feature/azure-network-redesign branch from e2a4b0c to 95fac1c Compare April 15, 2025 13:55
@connorbrown-db connorbrown-db marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2025 14:30
Copy link
Contributor

@tonykhbo tonykhbo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice changes and refactor! Looks good to me.

@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
locals {
create_sat_sp = var.sat_configuration.enabled && var.sat_service_principal.client_id == ""
sat_client_id = local.create_sat_sp ? azuread_service_principal.sat[0].client_id : var.sat_service_principal.client_id
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

NIT @connorbrown-db Maybe we should consider renaming the SP so that it's non-exclusive to SAT. Future customizations may leverage the same SP together with the SAT deployment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants