Skip to content

CNDB-13238: Fix flaky CounterLockManagerTest interruption tests that don't properly wait for a finally block to complete (#1820) #1879

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2025

Conversation

driftx
Copy link

@driftx driftx commented Jul 16, 2025

What is the issue

The final assert in this test checks that the locks have been cleaned up. These need to be released twice; once by the main thread, and once in the finally block of a thread started by the test. The test waits for a CompletableFuture to be set by this thread, but it does not wait for the finally block to finish.

What does this PR fix and why was it fixed

Join on the other thread in the test, which ensures the finally block completes before the last assertion that checks all refs to the locks have been released.

…don't properly wait for a finally block to complete (#1820)

### What is the issue
The final assert in this test checks that the locks have been cleaned
up. These need to be released twice; once by the main thread, and once
in the finally block of a thread started by the test. The test waits for
a CompletableFuture to be set by this thread, but it does not wait for
the finally block to finish.

### What does this PR fix and why was it fixed
Join on the other thread in the test, which ensures the finally block
completes before the last assertion that checks all refs to the locks
have been released.
@driftx
Copy link
Author

driftx commented Jul 16, 2025

Clean merge.

Copy link

Checklist before you submit for review

  • Make sure there is a PR in the CNDB project updating the Converged Cassandra version
  • Use NoSpamLogger for log lines that may appear frequently in the logs
  • Verify test results on Butler
  • Test coverage for new/modified code is > 80%
  • Proper code formatting
  • Proper title for each commit staring with the project-issue number, like CNDB-1234
  • Each commit has a meaningful description
  • Each commit is not very long and contains related changes
  • Renames, moves and reformatting are in distinct commits
  • All new files should contain the DataStax copyright header instead of the Apache License one

Copy link

@cassci-bot
Copy link

❌ Build ds-cassandra-pr-gate/PR-1879 rejected by Butler


31 new test failure(s) in 1 builds
See build details here


Found 31 new test failures

Showing only first 15 new test failures

Test Explanation Branch history Upstream history
...lidation.operations.AlterTest-compression_jdk11 regression 🔴
...nQueryShouldNotTimeoutWhenItExceedesReadTimeout regression 🔴
...nglePageReadIsFastButAggregationExceedesTimeout regression 🔴
...adCommitLogAndSSTablesWithDroppedColumnTestCC40 regression 🔴
...adCommitLogAndSSTablesWithDroppedColumnTestCC50 regression 🔴
...oadCommitLogAndSSTablesWithDroppedColumnTestDSE regression 🔴
...thRestartTest.testReadingValuesOfDroppedColumns regression 🔴
o.a.c.d.t.s.f.FeaturesVersionSupportDBTest.testANN regression 🔴
o.a.c.d.t.s.f.FeaturesVersionSupportDCTest.testANN regression 🔴
o.a.c.d.t.s.f.FeaturesVersionSupportEBTest.testANN regression 🔴
...c.FeaturesVersionSupportTest.testANNSupport[eb] regression 🔴
....FeaturesVersionSupportTest.testGeoDistance[aa] regression 🔴
....FeaturesVersionSupportTest.testGeoDistance[ba] regression 🔴
...cySSTableTest.testVerifyOldDroppedTupleSSTables regression 🔴
o.a.c.t.SSTablePartitionsTest.testDirectory regression 🔴

No known test failures found

@driftx driftx requested a review from djatnieks July 16, 2025 20:17
@driftx driftx merged commit b0a9c41 into main-5.0 Jul 17, 2025
572 of 590 checks passed
@driftx driftx deleted the CNDB-14825 branch July 17, 2025 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants