-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
Refactored import statements to use org.junit.Assert #1167
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…cated methods in junit.framework.Assert. Upgrades to junit 4.13.2
|
Introduce constants for different units and measures. |
|
From a programmer's point of view it would be nice to use general available constant for most cases and only a local constant if required. |
|
Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this PR has been inactive for 90 days (see PR stuck workflow). Of course this is not the final word. The PR can become unstuck, for example, by reengaging in the discussion, answering open questions, rebasing, or adding new commits to this PR. |
This PR contains minor improvements of the usage of JUnit API.
0.01d, see https://junit.org/junit4/javadoc/4.13/org/junit/Assert.html#assertArrayEquals(double[],%20double[],%20double)