Skip to content

feat(champ): improve type cast #11870

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tchak
Copy link
Member

@tchak tchak commented Jul 17, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 17, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 66.00000% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 85.45%. Comparing base (1b953ca) to head (c0d5632).
Report is 49 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...omponents/types_de_champ_editor/champ_component.rb 33.33% 10 Missing ⚠️
app/models/columns/champ_column.rb 45.45% 6 Missing ⚠️
...p/models/types_de_champ/formatted_type_de_champ.rb 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #11870      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.96%   85.45%   -4.51%     
==========================================
  Files        1298     1298              
  Lines       28552    28580      +28     
  Branches     5907     5914       +7     
==========================================
- Hits        25687    24424    -1263     
- Misses       2865     4156    +1291     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@tchak tchak force-pushed the champ-improve-cast branch from d70494c to c0d5632 Compare July 17, 2025 14:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant