Skip to content

Update dependency rubocop to v1.71.2#70

Merged
renovate[bot] merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/rubocop-1.x
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Update dependency rubocop to v1.71.2#70
renovate[bot] merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/rubocop-1.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 4, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
rubocop (source, changelog) '1.71.1' -> '1.71.2' age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

rubocop/rubocop (rubocop)

v1.71.2

Compare Source

Bug fixes
  • #​13782: Fix an error Layout/ElseAlignment when else is part of a numblock. ([@​earlopain][])
  • #​13395: Fix a false positive for Lint/UselessAssignment when assigning in branch and block. ([@​pCosta99][])
  • #​13783: Fix a false positive for Lint/Void when each numblock with conditional expressions that has multiple statements. ([@​earlopain][])
  • #​13787: Fix incorrect autocorrect for Style/ExplicitBlockArgument when using arguments of zsuper in method definition. ([@​koic][])
  • #​13785: Fix Style/EachWithObject cop error in case of single block argument. ([@​viralpraxis][])
  • #​13781: Fix a false positive for Lint/UnmodifiedReduceAccumulator when omitting the accumulator in a nested numblock. ([@​earlopain][])

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Signed-off-by: renovate[bot] <29139614+renovate[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@renovate renovate bot merged commit 06d22c4 into master Feb 4, 2025
2 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/rubocop-1.x branch February 4, 2025 14:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants