Merged
Conversation
kylebarron
changed the title
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
A precursor to #619, where first we ensure that we can run tests at all on these newer Python versions.
First, in this PR, we validate that we can compile and run tests at all on the newer Python versions. Then in #619 we can validate that the library works in free-threaded mode.
As noted in #619 (comment), we need to minimize what goes into the
devgroup, so that we don't try to compile downstream dependencies from scratch on 3.14tcffi(required bygoogle-auth) fails to install on 3.13t, so we only test on 3.14t, which should at least test a free-threaded mode. If users complain in the future we can add 3.13t tests as well somehow