Try using uv for unit test workflow #113
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@rlskoeser has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 0 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
WalkthroughThe pull request updates the GitHub Actions workflow for unit testing in a Python project. The modified workflow now uses Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Runner as GitHub Runner
participant Setup as Python Setup (actions/setup-python@v4)
participant UV as UV Installer (astral-sh/setup-uv@v5)
participant Sync as Dependency Manager (uv sync)
participant Test as Test Executor (uv run pytest)
Runner ->> Setup: Initialize Python environment with caching
Setup -->> Runner: Environment ready
Runner ->> UV: Install uv tool
UV -->> Runner: uv installed
Runner ->> Sync: Sync dependencies (all extras, dev)
Sync -->> Runner: Dependencies installed
Runner ->> Test: Run unit tests (and coverage reporting)
Test -->> Runner: Test results returned
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/unit_tests.yml (1)
30-31: Clarify Caching Comment and Its Context
The comment (“# use github python action instead of uv to take advantage of caching”) may confuse readers because later you install uv in a separate step. Please clarify that while the uv tool is used for dependency management and running tests, the setup-python step is still leveraged for pip caching.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/unit_tests.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/unit_tests.yml
32-32: property "python-version" is not defined in object type {python: number}
(expression)
33-33: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/workflows/unit_tests.yml (6)
33-33: Review Setup-Python Action Version
Static analysis indicates that actions/setup-python@v4 might be outdated. Consider verifying if an update to a newer version (if available, e.g. @v5) is beneficial and compatible with your workflow.🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
33-33: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v4" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
38-38: Intentional Blank Line or Separator?
The addition marked at line 38 appears to be an intentional separator. If it’s used for visual clarity between steps, please confirm that this formatting is intentional. Otherwise, remove any accidental whitespace.
39-41: Validate ‘Install uv’ Step Configuration
The new “Install uv” step (lines 39–41) correctly uses “astral-sh/setup-uv@v5” to install the uv tool. Just ensure that the configuration for uv meets the project’s requirements and does not conflict with any previously cached dependencies.
43-43: Adopt uv Sync for Dependency Installation
Switching to “uv sync --all-extras --dev” (line 43) aligns with the PR objectives to use uv for dependency management. Make sure that your project’s configuration (e.g., pyproject.toml) is compatible with uv’s expected setup.
47-47: Ensure Consistent Unit Test Execution Command
Changing the unit test command to “uv run pytest” (line 47) is in line with the updated workflow objective. Please verify that tests run correctly under uv’s environment and that this command covers all necessary parameters for your test suite.
52-52: Confirm Package Name for Coverage Reporting
The code coverage step (line 52) uses “uv run pytest --cov=undate”. Double-check that “undate” is the intended package name for coverage analysis. If this name is correct, then the step is well configured; otherwise, update it to match the target package.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
.github/workflows/unit_tests.yml (1)
32-32:⚠️ Potential issueFix Matrix Variable Reference.
The step "Set up Python" on line 32 continues to reference ${{ matrix.python-version }}, but the matrix is defined using the key "python". This mismatch could result in an undefined variable when executing the workflow.Suggested diff:
- - name: Set up Python ${{ matrix.python-version }} + - name: Set up Python ${{ matrix.python }}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/unit_tests.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.4)
.github/workflows/unit_tests.yml
39-39: could not parse as YAML: yaml: line 39: mapping values are not allowed in this context
(syntax-check)
🪛 YAMLlint (1.35.1)
.github/workflows/unit_tests.yml
[error] 39-39: syntax error: mapping values are not allowed here
(syntax)
rlskoeser
force-pushed
the
feature/uv-github-actions
branch
from
faf8036 to
e58e507
Compare
Updates github actions to use uv action for installing python packages and running python commands. Work is based on the documentation I found here: https://docs.astral.sh/uv/guides/integration/github/
I also adjusted the optional dependencies slightly so we can install the minimum packages needed for the tests or checks we're running.
The most recent run on the check workflow is 29s compared to 1m on another open PR (was comparing with #110) , but the unit tests are a second or two slower in each case.