Deploy and build improvements #741
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request involves significant modifications to GitHub Actions workflows related to the front-end build and deployment processes. The file Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
.github/workflows/lint_and_test.yml (3)
13-26: LGTM! Consider caching npm dependencies.The new
build-frontendjob looks good and aligns with the PR objective of consolidating the frontend build into this workflow. It uses a recent LTS version of Node.js and includes all necessary steps for building and type-checking the frontend.To improve build times, consider adding a step to cache npm dependencies. You can use the
actions/cacheaction for this purpose. Here's an example of how you could implement it:- uses: actions/cache@v3 with: path: ~/.npm key: ${{ runner.OS }}-node-${{ hashFiles('**/package-lock.json') }} restore-keys: | ${{ runner.OS }}-node-Add this step after the checkout step and before the
npm installstep.
47-47: Consider reducing the timeout value.The
timeout-minutesis set to 60, which might be excessive for most test runs. Unless your tests typically take close to an hour, consider reducing this value to a more reasonable duration (e.g., 15 or 30 minutes). This can help identify stuck or unexpectedly long-running tests more quickly.
Line range hint
1-93: Overall, excellent job consolidating the workflows!The changes in this file successfully address the PR objectives by:
- Consolidating the frontend build into the same workflow as the Python tests.
- Renaming the workflow to "Lint and Test" to better reflect its expanded scope.
- Restructuring the Python tests job to use environment variables and include necessary services.
These improvements will streamline the CI/CD process by allowing the deploy workflow to depend on both frontend and Python builds simultaneously, as intended. The changes are well-implemented and should reduce redundancy in the deployment process.
To further optimize this workflow, consider:
- Implementing caching for npm dependencies in the
build-frontendjob.- Fine-tuning the timeout value for the
python-testsjob.- Exploring opportunities to parallelize steps within jobs where possible.
These optimizations could potentially reduce the overall execution time of the workflow.
.github/workflows/deploy.yml (2)
44-44: LGTM: Job condition enhances deployment control.The added condition effectively ensures that the deployment job only runs when triggered manually or after a successful 'Lint and Test' workflow. This change aligns well with the PR's goal of streamlining the deployment process.
For improved readability, consider using GitHub Actions' built-in contexts:
if: ${{ github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' || github.event.workflow_run.conclusion == 'success' }}This suggestion maintains the same logic while leveraging GitHub's native syntax.
82-83: LGTM: Enhanced deployment description improves traceability.The addition of a dynamic description to the GitHub deployment creation step is an excellent improvement. It provides clear context about what's being deployed and to which environment, enhancing traceability and understanding of each deployment.
Consider adding the PR number (if available) to further improve traceability:
description: "Deploying ${{ github.head_ref || github.ref }} to AWS ${{ env.DEPLOY_ENV }}${{ github.event.pull_request.number && format(' (PR #{0})', github.event.pull_request.number) || '' }}"This suggestion adds the PR number to the description when the deployment is triggered by a pull request, providing even more context.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/build_frontend.yml (0 hunks)
- .github/workflows/deploy.yml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/lint_and_test.yml (4 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- .github/workflows/build_frontend.yml
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (4)
.github/workflows/lint_and_test.yml (2)
44-44: Indentation fix looks good.The correction of indentation for the
npm installstep improves code readability.
45-49: Great improvements to the Python testing job!The changes to the
python-testsjob (renamed fromtests) are well-implemented:
- The job renaming improves clarity.
- Using an environment variable for the Python version simplifies the configuration.
- The use of the environment variable in the Python setup step is correct.
These changes align well with the PR objectives and improve the overall structure of the workflow.
Also applies to: 74-77
.github/workflows/deploy.yml (2)
27-27: LGTM: Workflow trigger update aligns with PR objectives.The change to trigger the deployment after the 'Lint and Test' workflow is completed aligns perfectly with the PR's objective of consolidating the frontend and Python build workflows. This modification helps reduce redundant deployments by ensuring that the deployment process only starts after all tests and lint checks have passed.
Line range hint
1-190: Overall: Excellent improvements to the deployment workflow.The changes made to this workflow file effectively address the PR objectives:
- The workflow trigger has been updated to depend on the consolidated 'Lint and Test' workflow.
- A new condition has been added to control when the deployment job runs.
- The deployment description has been enhanced for better traceability.
These modifications streamline the deployment process, reduce redundant deployments, and improve the overall robustness of the CI/CD pipeline. The changes are well-thought-out and align perfectly with the goal of consolidating the frontend and Python build workflows.
Great job on these improvements!
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅ Additional details and impacted files📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
Description
This consolidates the frontend build and the python build workflows into a single workflow. The main reason is so that the deploy workflow can depend on both of them together instead of only one or the other (previously deploy was being triggered by both workflows independently resulting in 2 deploys per PR merge).