Skip to content

[RyuJit Wasm] fix off by one error for br_table #123565

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
AndyAyersMS wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+7 −1
Open

[RyuJit Wasm] fix off by one error for br_table #123565

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
187e9b9
[RyuJit Wasm] fix off by one error for br_table
AndyAyersMS Jan 23, 2026
401f9bb
feedback
AndyAyersMS Jan 24, 2026
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion src/coreclr/jit/codegenwasm.cpp
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -566,7 +566,7 @@ void CodeGen::genTableBasedSwitch(GenTree* treeNode)
assert(caseCount > 0);
assert(desc->HasDefaultCase());

GetEmitter()->emitIns_I(INS_br_table, EA_4BYTE, caseCount);
GetEmitter()->emitIns_I(INS_br_table, EA_4BYTE, caseCount - 1);

Copy link
Contributor

@adamperlin adamperlin Jan 23, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you potentially add a comment here explaining that this loop will handle emitting all the targets, including the default, even though in the above count we excluded it because of Wasm's convention? We could also consider pulling emitting the default out of the loop just to be extra clear here, though I know we also have the assert above to ensure we do have a default case.

Copy link
Member Author

@AndyAyersMS AndyAyersMS Jan 24, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes. Take another look.

for (unsigned caseNum = 0; caseNum < caseCount; caseNum++)
{
Expand Down
Loading