Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: |worker| health_check add JWT_SECRET and DOMAINS #573

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2025

Conversation

dreamhunter2333
Copy link
Owner

@dreamhunter2333 dreamhunter2333 commented Jan 23, 2025

PR Type

enhancement


Description

  • Added JWT_SECRET and DOMAINS checks to health check endpoint.

  • Refactored health check logic into a separate function.

  • Imported getStringArray utility function.


Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
worker.ts
Enhance health check endpoint with additional validations

worker/src/worker.ts

  • Added JWT_SECRET and DOMAINS checks to health check endpoint.
  • Refactored health check logic into a separate function.
  • Imported getStringArray utility function.
  • +15/-8   

    Need help?
  • Type /help how to ... in the comments thread for any questions about PR-Agent usage.
  • Check out the documentation for more information.
  • Copy link

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Possible Issue

    The health_check function checks if getStringArray(c.env.DOMAINS).length === 0 to determine if DOMAINS is set. This might not be a reliable check if getStringArray returns an array with empty strings or other falsy values. Ensure getStringArray handles such cases correctly.

    const health_check = async (c: Context<HonoCustomType>) => {
    	if (!c.env.DB) {
    		return c.text("DB is not available", 400);
    	}
    	if (!c.env.JWT_SECRET) {
    		return c.text("JWT_SECRET is not set", 400);
    	}
    	if (getStringArray(c.env.DOMAINS).length === 0) {
    		return c.text("DOMAINS is not set", 400);
    	}

    Copy link

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Handle potential errors in getStringArray

    Ensure that the getStringArray function handles potential errors or exceptions that
    may arise when processing c.env.DOMAINS to avoid unexpected crashes.

    worker/src/worker.ts [220-221]

    -if (getStringArray(c.env.DOMAINS).length === 0) {
    +let domains;
    +try {
    +    domains = getStringArray(c.env.DOMAINS);
    +} catch (error) {
    +    return c.text("Error processing DOMAINS", 500);
    +}
    +if (domains.length === 0) {
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion is important as it ensures that any potential errors or exceptions in the getStringArray function are handled, preventing unexpected crashes and improving the robustness of the code.

    8
    Validate c.env.DOMAINS before use

    Add a check to ensure that c.env.DOMAINS is defined before calling getStringArray to
    prevent potential runtime errors.

    worker/src/worker.ts [220-221]

    -if (getStringArray(c.env.DOMAINS).length === 0) {
    +if (!c.env.DOMAINS || getStringArray(c.env.DOMAINS).length === 0) {
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: This suggestion is relevant as it adds a check to ensure that c.env.DOMAINS is defined before calling getStringArray, which helps prevent potential runtime errors and improves code safety.

    7

    @dreamhunter2333 dreamhunter2333 merged commit 01e6cb1 into main Jan 24, 2025
    1 check passed
    @dreamhunter2333 dreamhunter2333 deleted the feature/dev branch January 24, 2025 07:00
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Labels
    None yet
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    1 participant