-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 738
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix "substract" typo #16431
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Fix "substract" typo #16431
Conversation
24edca3
to
521cc92
Compare
The OMR Acceptance build is not healthy at the moment. I won't launch testing here until that is fixed, as a coordinated merge requires a clean set of tests (or at least I don't want to merge unless that is the case). |
Once eclipse-omr/omr#6977 is merged we should be good. |
Jenkins test sanity.functional,sanity.openjdk all jdk8,jdk11,jdk17,jdk20 depends eclipse-omr/omr#6840 |
There are a number of failures from the mock acceptance build above. I would have only expected this PR to cause build problems, not functional issues, so I doubt these are related to this PR. Nevertheless, I'd like to see these tests cleaner than this. Can you rebase both the OMR and OpenJ9 PRs since the known problem in the acceptance build was reverted yesterday, and I will relaunch the tests? If problems persist after that I'll ask you to investigate. Thanks. |
521cc92
to
b9c9c9d
Compare
Jenkins test sanity.functional,sanity.openjdk all jdk8,jdk11,jdk17,jdk20 depends eclipse-omr/omr#6840 |
Jenkins test sanity.functional xlinux jdk17,jdk20 |
Jenkins test sanity.functional,sanity.openjdk xmac jdk20 |
Jenkins test sanity.functional,sanity.openjdk aix jdk11 |
Jenkins test sanity.openjdk xmac jdk11 depends eclipse-omr/omr#6840 |
Jenkins test sanity.openjdk zlinux jdk20 depends eclipse-omr/omr#6840 |
b9c9c9d
to
affe6ab
Compare
Just FYI that I won't re-launch the testing above until the OMR acceptance build is clean (it has been unhealthy for over a week now). |
I'll rebase this and the OMR PR again once the OMR acceptance build is healthy, and hopefully every goes smoothly from there. |
Acceptance build is reasonably stable. May as well rebase this and the OMR PR and we can try again. |
affe6ab
to
ddd872a
Compare
Jenkins test sanity.functional,sanity.openjdk all jdk8,jdk11,jdk17,jdk20 depends eclipse-omr/omr#6840 |
1 similar comment
Jenkins test sanity.functional,sanity.openjdk all jdk8,jdk11,jdk17,jdk20 depends eclipse-omr/omr#6840 |
@Spencer-Comin Can you rebase this branch as well just for sanity? |
Signed-off-by: Spencer Comin <[email protected]>
ddd872a
to
0ca4963
Compare
Added remaining instances of "substract" that I found through the codebase |
I assume this depends on eclipse-omr/omr#6840 , right ? |
@r30shah yes, I've updated the description to say that |
Jenkins test sanity.functional,sanity.openjdk all jdk8,jdk11,jdk17 depends eclipse-omr/omr#6840 |
@Spencer-Comin Can you verify the JDK11 s390 failure are not related to these changes ? |
@r30shah The JDK11 failure looks like an instance of #14948 |
Jenkins test sanity.openjdk zlinux jdk11 depends eclipse-omr/omr#6840 |
substract -> subtract
depends on eclipse-omr/omr#6840