Skip to content

Remove getZoomForAutoscaleProperty calls for win32#1401

Closed
amartya4256 wants to merge 2 commits intoeclipse-platform:masterfrom
amartya4256:remove_getZoomForAutoscaleProperty_calls
Closed

Remove getZoomForAutoscaleProperty calls for win32#1401
amartya4256 wants to merge 2 commits intoeclipse-platform:masterfrom
amartya4256:remove_getZoomForAutoscaleProperty_calls

Conversation

@amartya4256
Copy link
Contributor

@amartya4256 amartya4256 commented Aug 12, 2024

This PR contributes to the removal of getZoomForAutoscaleProperty calls for win32 which is used to have the right zoom level for the widgets based on what the native zoom of the monitor is. However, this method is only needed for images and the rest can be taken care of by the Layout Manager while using native zoom.

contributes #62 and #127

@amartya4256 amartya4256 force-pushed the remove_getZoomForAutoscaleProperty_calls branch from 01cd52e to 6047226 Compare August 12, 2024 16:20
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Aug 12, 2024

Test Results

   486 files  ±0     486 suites  ±0   7m 33s ⏱️ - 2m 3s
 4 151 tests ±0   4 143 ✅ ±0   8 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
16 358 runs  ±0  16 266 ✅ ±0  92 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit cf6ade2. ± Comparison against base commit 8aec5fc.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@akurtakov
Copy link
Member

This seems to have stalled. Is it still needed?

@HeikoKlare
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, this is still under investigation for Windows HiDPI support. @amartya4256 can you please add a short documentation to this PR explaining what it is supposed to do/evaluate?

@amartya4256 amartya4256 changed the title WIP Remove getZoomForAutoscaleProperty calls for win32 Oct 14, 2024
@amartya4256
Copy link
Contributor Author

@HeikoKlare I have updated the description, but the work is on halt right now since we have to figure out the image scaling issue first.

@amartya4256
Copy link
Contributor Author

This PR is obsolete now. Closing it.

@amartya4256 amartya4256 closed this Mar 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants