Skip to content

Conversation

@akioogawa
Copy link

@akioogawa akioogawa commented May 2, 2025

Briefly, what does this PR introduce?

New Forward EM calorimeter geometry with current design. There are 2 models, homogeneous and Wpowder+ScFi.
Also removes active insert, which won't be built.
See following links for some more details:
https://www.star.bnl.gov/~akio/epic/geometry/index.html
https://www.star.bnl.gov/~akio/epic/reco/index.html
https://www.star.bnl.gov/~akio/epic/hadron/index.html

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

  • Bug fix (issue #__)
  • New feature (issue #__)
  • Documentation update
  • Other: __

Please check if this PR fulfills the following:

  • Tests for the changes have been added
  • Documentation has been added / updated
  • Changes have been communicated to collaborators

Does this PR introduce breaking changes? What changes might users need to make to their code?

See also PR for EICrecon for digitization change
eic/EICrecon#1848

Does this PR change default behavior?

Not until default configuration files start to use new geometry

@akioogawa
Copy link
Author

akioogawa commented May 2, 2025

Auto check uses craterlake for overlap checks. Do I change craterlake (and all other craterlake_*)?

@veprbl
Copy link
Member

veprbl commented May 2, 2025

Auto check uses craterlake for overlap checks. Do I change craterlake (and all other craterlake_*)?

Yes, please update all configurations to use your new xml.

Copy link
Member

@veprbl veprbl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have some preliminary comments.

@akioogawa

This comment was marked as resolved.

@akioogawa
Copy link
Author

I think the overlap is now gone. 2 pending checks after 1/2 day. Anything else?

@akioogawa
Copy link
Author

I have no idea what those 2 failed check are : nvidia-smi & sim:zdc_lyso

Copy link
Member

@veprbl veprbl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have a question about segmentation. I think, we should make it into a consistent bit field for both implementations.

veprbl
veprbl previously approved these changes Nov 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

topic: calorimetry topic: forward Positive-rapidity detectors (hadron-going side) topic: infrastructure Regarding build system, CI, CD topic: materials

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants