Skip to content

ESQL: Added status to OrdinalsGroupingOperator #130720

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

ivancea
Copy link
Contributor

@ivancea ivancea commented Jul 7, 2025

Closes #130359

@ivancea ivancea added >non-issue Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) :Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL v9.2.0 labels Jul 7, 2025
@ivancea ivancea requested a review from nik9000 July 7, 2025 13:19
@ivancea ivancea marked this pull request as ready for review July 8, 2025 15:41
@elasticsearchmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-analytical-engine (Team:Analytics)

# Conflicts:
#	server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/TransportVersions.java
@ivancea ivancea requested a review from nik9000 July 9, 2025 09:40
# Conflicts:
#	server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/TransportVersions.java
@ivancea ivancea marked this pull request as draft July 9, 2025 13:35
ivancea and others added 2 commits July 10, 2025 12:16
@ivancea ivancea marked this pull request as ready for review July 10, 2025 15:05
# Conflicts:
#	server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/TransportVersions.java
@@ -338,6 +338,7 @@ static TransportVersion def(int id) {
public static final TransportVersion ESQL_FIXED_INDEX_LIKE = def(9_119_0_00);
public static final TransportVersion LOOKUP_JOIN_CCS = def(9_120_0_00);
public static final TransportVersion NODE_USAGE_STATS_FOR_THREAD_POOLS_IN_CLUSTER_INFO = def(9_121_0_00);
public static final TransportVersion ESQL_ORDINALS_OPERATOR_STATUS = def(9_122_0_00);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you are going to backport you should make the backport transport versions and use them in this PR before merging.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You could do it in a follow-up PR, but this PR is small enough I'd do it in this one.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Versions added!

Copy link
Member

@nik9000 nik9000 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

New transport version LGTM.

@dnhatn
Copy link
Member

dnhatn commented Jul 11, 2025

Hi @ivancea, I am working to remove this operator if the ordinal blocks perform comparably. Could you please hold off on merging this PR? Sorry for delaying/blocking your hard work.

@ivancea
Copy link
Contributor Author

ivancea commented Jul 16, 2025

Operator removed on #131133

@ivancea ivancea closed this Jul 16, 2025
@ivancea ivancea deleted the ordinals-grouping-operator-status branch July 16, 2025 13:30
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Analytics/ES|QL AKA ESQL >non-issue Team:Analytics Meta label for analytical engine team (ESQL/Aggs/Geo) v8.19.1 v9.1.1 v9.2.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

ESQL: OrdinalsGroupingOperator not reporting process_nanos
4 participants