-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.3k
ESQL: Added status to OrdinalsGroupingOperator #130720
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
.../esql/compute/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/compute/operator/OrdinalsGroupingOperator.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
.../esql/compute/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/compute/operator/OrdinalsGroupingOperator.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
# Conflicts: # server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/TransportVersions.java
Pinging @elastic/es-analytical-engine (Team:Analytics) |
# Conflicts: # server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/TransportVersions.java
# Conflicts: # server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/TransportVersions.java
# Conflicts: # server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/TransportVersions.java
# Conflicts: # server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/TransportVersions.java
@@ -338,6 +338,7 @@ static TransportVersion def(int id) { | |||
public static final TransportVersion ESQL_FIXED_INDEX_LIKE = def(9_119_0_00); | |||
public static final TransportVersion LOOKUP_JOIN_CCS = def(9_120_0_00); | |||
public static final TransportVersion NODE_USAGE_STATS_FOR_THREAD_POOLS_IN_CLUSTER_INFO = def(9_121_0_00); | |||
public static final TransportVersion ESQL_ORDINALS_OPERATOR_STATUS = def(9_122_0_00); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you are going to backport you should make the backport transport versions and use them in this PR before merging.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You could do it in a follow-up PR, but this PR is small enough I'd do it in this one.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Versions added!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
New transport version LGTM.
Hi @ivancea, I am working to remove this operator if the ordinal blocks perform comparably. Could you please hold off on merging this PR? Sorry for delaying/blocking your hard work. |
# Conflicts: # server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/TransportVersions.java
Operator removed on #131133 |
Closes #130359