Skip to content

docs-builder: add pull-requests: write permission to docs-build workflow #17720

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

reakaleek
Copy link
Member

Details

⚠️ This PR was created by an automated tool. Please review the changes carefully. ⚠️

Add permissions pull-requests: write to the docs-build workflow.

Why

We want to comment on the PR with the links to modified docs pages.

See elastic/docs-builder#1395 for further details

@reakaleek reakaleek self-assigned this Jun 20, 2025
@reakaleek reakaleek requested review from Mpdreamz and cotti June 20, 2025 14:47
Copy link
Contributor

🤖 GitHub comments

Expand to view the GitHub comments

Just comment with:

  • run docs-build : Re-trigger the docs validation. (use unformatted text in the comment!)

Copy link
Contributor

mergify bot commented Jun 20, 2025

This pull request does not have a backport label. Could you fix it @reakaleek? 🙏
To fixup this pull request, you need to add the backport labels for the needed
branches, such as:

  • backport-8./d is the label to automatically backport to the 8./d branch. /d is the digit.
  • If no backport is necessary, please add the backport-skip label

Copy link
Contributor

@karenzone karenzone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@reakaleek reakaleek added the backport-skip Skip automated backport with mergify label Jun 23, 2025
@reakaleek reakaleek merged commit ff54065 into elastic:main Jun 23, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-skip Skip automated backport with mergify
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants