Skip to content

[9.0] (backport #17727) Standardize image artifact name #17755

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2025

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jun 27, 2025

Release notes

[rn:skip]

What does this PR do?

Standardize the arch in image artifact name to amd64 (instead of x86_64), and arm64 (instead of aarch64)

Why is it important/What is the impact to the user?

Initiative from the Release-Eng team to standardize the image artifact names across projects

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files (and/or docker env variables)
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

Author's Checklist

  • DRA job has renamed the image files.

How to test this PR locally

Related issues

Use cases

Screenshots

Logs


This is an automatic backport of pull request #17727 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

Standardize the arch in image artifact name to amd64 (instead of x86_64), and arm64 (instead of aarch64)

(cherry picked from commit 5f54c0c)
@mergify mergify bot added the backport label Jun 27, 2025
@mergify mergify bot mentioned this pull request Jun 27, 2025
6 tasks
@kaisecheng kaisecheng merged commit d7e487a into 9.0 Jun 27, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
@kaisecheng kaisecheng deleted the mergify/bp/9.0/pr-17727 branch June 27, 2025 17:44
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

💚 Build Succeeded

cc @kaisecheng

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants