Skip to content

[9.1] (backport #17745) Moved dependabot reviewers to codeowners #17773

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 9.1
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Jul 4, 2025

Release notes

[rn:skip]

What does this PR do?

Removed reviewers section in dependabot.yml and added CODEOWNERS.yml with related definition for observablt-ci && observablt-ci-contractors

Why is it important/What is the impact to the user?

Reviewers dependabot.yml configuration is being retired option because the functionality overlaps with GitHub code owners.
See: https://github.blog/changelog/2025-04-29-dependabot-reviewers-configuration-option-being-replaced-by-code-owners/

Checklist

  • [x ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • [ ] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • [ ] I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files (and/or docker env variables)
  • [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

Related issues

Logs


This is an automatic backport of pull request #17745 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

* moved dependabot reviewers to codeowners

(cherry picked from commit e9a3b7e)
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Jul 4, 2025

🤖 GitHub comments

Expand to view the GitHub comments

Just comment with:

  • run docs-build : Re-trigger the docs validation. (use unformatted text in the comment!)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant