Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.x](backport #4501) Add reference to prefer-ilm setting for apm lifeycle known bug #4515

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Description

Clarify that one of the suggested fix for the unmanaged indices bug introduced in 8.15.0 and fixed in 8.15.1 should only be applied for datatreams with default policies (as they are the only ones affected). If the suggested fix was applied to a datastream using custom ILM policy then the prefer_ilm setting needs to be added to the custom ILM policy.

Documentation sets edited in this PR

Check all that apply.

  • Stateful (docs/en/observability/*)
  • Serverless (docs/en/serverless/*)
  • Integrations Developer Guide (docs/en/integrations/*)
  • None of the above

Related issue

Closes #

Checklist

  • Product/Engineering Review
  • Writer Review

Follow-up tasks

Select one.

  • This PR does not need to be ported to another doc set because:
    • The concepts in this PR only apply to one doc set (serverless or stateful)
    • The PR contains edits to both doc sets (serverless and stateful)
  • This PR needs to be ported to another doc set:
    • Port to stateful docs: <link to PR or tracking issue>
    • Port to serverless docs: <link to PR or tracking issue>

This is an automatic backport of pull request #4501 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com).

* Add reference to prefer-ilm setting for apm lifeycle known bug

* Refactor

* APM known issue correction

* Update docs/en/observability/apm/known-issues.asciidoc

Co-authored-by: Colleen McGinnis <[email protected]>

* clean up text

* Update docs/en/observability/apm/known-issues.asciidoc

Co-authored-by: Vishal Raj <[email protected]>

---------

Co-authored-by: Francesco Gualazzi <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Brandon Morelli <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Colleen McGinnis <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit c576b14)
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner November 8, 2024 19:36
@mergify mergify bot added the backport label Nov 8, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 8, 2024

A documentation preview will be available soon.

Request a new doc build by commenting
  • Rebuild this PR: run docs-build
  • Rebuild this PR and all Elastic docs: run docs-build rebuild

run docs-build is much faster than run docs-build rebuild. A rebuild should only be needed in rare situations.

If your PR continues to fail for an unknown reason, the doc build pipeline may be broken. Elastic employees can check the pipeline status here.

@bmorelli25 bmorelli25 enabled auto-merge (squash) November 8, 2024 19:52
@bmorelli25 bmorelli25 merged commit b044189 into 8.x Nov 8, 2024
8 checks passed
@bmorelli25 bmorelli25 deleted the mergify/bp/8.x/pr-4501 branch November 8, 2024 20:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants