Skip to content

Conversation

@cryoshida
Copy link

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Release Notes: Yes/No

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 14, 2026

Deploy Preview for cerulean-figolla-1f9435 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit cfb1c2a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/cerulean-figolla-1f9435/deploys/69681f08f886ba0008f989e7
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-7959--cerulean-figolla-1f9435.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@cryoshida cryoshida force-pushed the health-check-overwrites branch 4 times, most recently from 1dd6dcf to aa8c906 Compare January 14, 2026 19:06
Copy link
Contributor

@nareddyt nareddyt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great! I am not familiar with e2e test setup, but all other files LGTM


// Validate the fields within the HealthCheckOverrides structure.
func (h *HealthCheckOverrides) Validate() error {
if h.Port > 65535 {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

0 should be considered invalid as well, it is typically reserved for bind() calls

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated in a separate commit!

@cryoshida cryoshida force-pushed the health-check-overwrites branch from aa8c906 to 20752b9 Compare January 14, 2026 22:55
@cryoshida cryoshida force-pushed the health-check-overwrites branch from 20752b9 to cfb1c2a Compare January 14, 2026 22:56
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 17, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 90.62500% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 72.85%. Comparing base (3fd3e4a) to head (cfb1c2a).
⚠️ Report is 13 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
internal/gatewayapi/clustersettings.go 75.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
internal/ir/xds.go 85.71% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7959      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.80%   72.85%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files         235      235              
  Lines       35313    35335      +22     
==========================================
+ Hits        25709    25744      +35     
+ Misses       7781     7772       -9     
+ Partials     1823     1819       -4     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants